On Monday, March 05, 2012 04:01:17 PM Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
ping
pong !
On Thursday 01 March 2012 07:16 PM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
On Thursday 01 March 2012 05:12 PM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
On Thursday 01 March 2012 11:09 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
Hi
On 5 March 2012 09:40, Wei Zhang charleyhu...@tamu.edu wrote:
Thank you very much for the response.
Do you mean that the hardware can also detect other signal, even it's not a
valid 802.11 one, say 802.15.4 if they are working in exactly the same
channel(eg. 802.11 ch 11, 802.15.4 ch 23)?
I
Hi,
* You need to say how you're testing throughput;
* You should check whether you're associating at HT40 or not. If
you're associating at HT40 (1 stream) then yes, you should be able to
do MCS7, 2 stream, long-GI. That's a PHY rate of 130MBit.
Adrian
On 5 March 2012 10:06, Igor Pinotti
Hello,
* I'm verifying the throughput based on the infos that the device shows
me... i'm using a samsung galaxy (mobile phone) and a dell notebook with
wifi bgn (Ubuntu 11)... both of them give me 64mpbs...
* The module atheros 9285 that i have has only one stream (plug in for
antenna)
* How do
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 5 March 2012 09:40, Wei Zhang charleyhu...@tamu.edu wrote:
Thank you very much for the response.
Do you mean that the hardware can also detect other signal, even it's
not a
valid 802.11 one, say 802.15.4 if they
On 5 March 2012 11:24, Igor Pinotti igorpino...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
* I'm verifying the throughput based on the infos that the device shows
me... i'm using a samsung galaxy (mobile phone) and a dell notebook with
wifi bgn (Ubuntu 11)... both of them give me 64mpbs...
Hi,
I'm afraid I
Hi,
You're likely much more versed in the nuances of the specification than I am. :)
My understanding of the AR_PHY_CCA_THRESH62 field is that it indeed is
the value that defines the -62 dBm CCA threshold, likely used for what
is termed mode 1.
The other detection modes are likely engaged when
would you like me to test this patch,
? Sure, I would like someone with a AR9300+ to test the patch.
Currently, I'm stuck with a puny AR9287 [in a router].
So, I can't run tests all day :(.
i can just ran a bidirectional traffic test parallel y enabling
PAPRD,with this proposed patch.
