Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v5] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 22:25 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: My last PATCH included some changes at a TI driver which was adapted in wireless-testing in John's tree. As I touch that many drivers I would like to use your tree instead, to provide a proper PATCH that builds at your tree

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v5] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Thomas Huehn
Hi Johannes, On my Linux box I applied and compiled the current v5 version of the patch successfully. On top of the following freshly checked out git repos I put the remove-sta patch: (1) url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git last commit

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v5] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:27 +0200, Thomas Huehn wrote: (2) url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git last commit e4cbd6542efdab97ed6d38e706b7cac51c68ced7 I'm on this commit + your patch. CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.o

[ath9k-devel] bluetooth does not work (AR9485).

2012-07-26 Thread Yevgeniy Melnichuk
Hi everybody, my notebook is equipped with a AR9485. Wireless LAN works flawlessly, but bluetooth does not. Scanning shows no devices although my smartphone should be visible. A second notebook equipped with a intel chip finds the smartphone. Other way around does not work either. I configure the

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:09 +0200, Thomas Huehn wrote: The pointer control.sta is removed from ieee80211_tx_info to free up sufficient memory in SKB_CB on the tx-path to enable new annotations per data packet e.g.support of upcoming Transmit Power Control (TPC). Now the control.sta pointer is

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:09 +0200, Thomas Huehn wrote: The pointer control.sta is removed from ieee80211_tx_info to free up sufficient memory in SKB_CB on the tx-path to enable new annotations per data packet e.g.support of upcoming

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Arik Nemtsov
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Thomas Huehn tho...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote: Hi Johannes, Johannes Berg schrieb: /home/johannes/sys/wireless/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c: In function ‘wl1271_skb_queue_head’:

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Arik Nemtsov
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Arik Nemtsov a...@wizery.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Thomas Huehn tho...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote: Hi Johannes, Johannes Berg schrieb: /home/johannes/sys/wireless/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c: In function

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] qca-swiss-army-knife: Add a tool to dump EEPROM

2012-07-26 Thread Holger Schurig
I dislike the name edump. It's a tool to dump EEPROMs of ath9k chips, e.g. not a generic eeprom dumper. ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Arik Nemtsov
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Arik Nemtsov a...@wizery.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Arik Nemtsov a...@wizery.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Thomas Huehn tho...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote: Hi Johannes, Johannes Berg schrieb:

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v6] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

2012-07-26 Thread Thomas Huehn
Hi Arik, Arik Nemtsov schrieb: Better to just wait some time. I wrote up something to make it much easier for you. Waiting for some internal review before sending it up. Thx for helping out here, I ws allready checking into what kind of struct I can put the sta pointer. But if you have a

[ath9k-devel] List Subscription Page Has Expired Certificate

2012-07-26 Thread jg
I am only posting this to the list as I am unable to access https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel When I attempt to access the site, I get this: --- Secure Connection Failed lists.ath9k.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate does