Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Move generic entries below specific ones in ath_pci_id_table.

"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes: >>> So, after seeing that the rest of the file is sorted this way (generic >>> section after the specific ones), I concluded that the 0x002A sorting >>> was wrong in the first place, and so is 0x0029. Then I sent this patch >>>

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Move generic entries below specific ones in ath_pci_id_table.

Hello, On 12/10/2016 15:34:46 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes: > >> Hello, >> >> On 04/10/2016 17:46:44 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes: >>> If generic entries are

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Move generic entries below specific ones in ath_pci_id_table.

"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes: > Hello, > > On 04/10/2016 17:46:44 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote: >> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes: >> >>> If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the >>> former will be

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] ath9k: EEPROM swapping improvements

Martin Blumenstingl writes: > There are two types of swapping the EEPROM data in the ath9k driver. > Before this series one type of swapping could not be used without the > other. > > The first type of swapping looks at the "magic bytes" at the start of > the