[ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: validate for non-zero BSSID

2011-11-29 Thread Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com before concluding that the recieved beacon is for us, let us make sure that the BSSID is non-zero. Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: validate for non-zero BSSID

2011-11-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: before concluding that the recieved beacon is for us, let us make sure that the BSSID is non-zero. Under what circumstances would the BSSID be zero? //Peter ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: validate for non-zero BSSID

2011-11-29 Thread Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
Hi Peter, On Wednesday 30 November 2011 08:06 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: before concluding that the recieved beacon is for us, let us make sure that the BSSID is non-zero. Under what circumstances would the BSSID be zero? //Peter unassociated state for

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: validate for non-zero BSSID

2011-11-29 Thread Kalle Valo
Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan moham...@qca.qualcomm.com writes: unassociated state for station. but I observed this when i tested ad-hoc mode. I just started an ad-hoc mode creator and left it for some time with no one joining. i observed there are few frames in rx_tasklet of ath9k driver which

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: validate for non-zero BSSID

2011-11-29 Thread Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 12:17 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhanmoham...@qca.qualcomm.com writes: unassociated state for station. but I observed this when i tested ad-hoc mode. I just started an ad-hoc mode creator and left it for some time with no one joining. i observed