Gabor Juhos wrote:
> > Also, after addressing Christopher's comments, I don't think too many
> > bus specific routines would remain. In that case would it be reasonable
> > to just have a single file (bus.c, with appropriate ifdefs), instead
> > of pci.c and ahb.c ?
>
> We will have 3 of them actu
Sujith írta:
> Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> +#ifndef _LINUX_ATH9K_PLATFORM_H
>> +#define _LINUX_ATH9L_PLATFORM_H
>
> Typo ?
Oops, yes.
> Also, after addressing Christopher's comments, I don't think too many
> bus specific routines would remain. In that case would it be reasonable
> to just have a singl
Gabor Juhos wrote:
> +#ifndef _LINUX_ATH9K_PLATFORM_H
> +#define _LINUX_ATH9L_PLATFORM_H
Typo ?
Also, after addressing Christopher's comments, I don't think too many
bus specific routines would remain. In that case would it be reasonable
to just have a single file (bus.c, with appropriate ifdefs)
On the AR913x SOCs we have to provide EEPROM contents via platform_data,
because accessing the flash via MMIO is not safe. Additionally different
boards may store the radio calibration data at different locations.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos
Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath
