Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Sujith
Pavel Machek wrote: > We know the code currently works on PC; but this adds conversions that > are nop on PowerPC and do something on PC... so they should have no > effect on PowerPC and could break PC...? Well, I tested the patch on x86 and it seemed to work okay. But yeah, it needs to be tested

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > ...so I indentified two endianness problems in eeprom, but even with > > both fixed, it still will not associate. Is there some way to dump USB > > packets, then compare them between PC and PowerPC versions? Should I > > expect them to match? > > Does this patch help ? Actually I wonder.

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > ...so I indentified two endianness problems in eeprom, but even with > > both fixed, it still will not associate. Is there some way to dump USB > > packets, then compare them between PC and PowerPC versions? Should I > > expect them to match? > > Does this patch help ? No, it does not se

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Sujith
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Sujith, I see you fought with endianness issues on ath9k_htc > > > driver. Was you able to test it on actual hardware? Should I try the > > > version just after your commit? > > > > No, I never had a chance to test the driver on a big-endian system. > > I assume

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Sujith
Pavel Machek wrote: > ...so I indentified two endianness problems in eeprom, but even with > both fixed, it still will not associate. Is there some way to dump USB > packets, then compare them between PC and PowerPC versions? Should I > expect them to match? Does this patch help ? diff --git a/dr

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-29 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Sujith, I see you fought with endianness issues on ath9k_htc > > > driver. Was you able to test it on actual hardware? Should I try the > > > version just after your commit? > > > > No, I never had a chance to test the driver on a big-endian system. > > I assume you are referring to thi

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-26 Thread Sujith
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Sujith, I see you fought with endianness issues on ath9k_htc > driver. Was you able to test it on actual hardware? Should I try the > version just after your commit? No, I never had a chance to test the driver on a big-endian system. I assume you are referring to thi

[ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc vs. powerpc (was Re: working usb wifi card, that is still possible to buy)

2010-11-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > | D-Link DWA-131| 07d1:3303 | realtek?| > > | > > This one should work with driver r8712u in staging in kernel 2.6.37-rcX. I > don't > have this model for testing, but the DWA-130 is rock solid with that driv