Re: I don't get it, perhaps you could include an expanded explanation in a textual message, now that our machine protocol has broken down.

2005-04-08 Thread Henry Story
My mother does this all the time. :-) On 8 Apr 2005, at 14:23, Bill de hÓra wrote: :) Only that it's common enough (in my part of the world anyway) to send short messages in subject lines that end with 'eom'. The point is that people do communicate solely through subject lines in email. I think

Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad

2005-04-08 Thread Robert Sayre
Walter Underwood wrote: --On Friday, April 08, 2005 01:33:20 AM -0400 Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Accessibility is a non-starter absent expert opinion or substantially similar formats. Frankly, the notion that remote content constitutes an accessibility concern is absurd. Might as well

Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad

2005-04-08 Thread Walter Underwood
--On April 8, 2005 6:59:47 PM -0400 Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Walter, you are missing my point. You've said it yourself: Maybe summaries are optional, but not because accessibility is optional.[0] That was in reply to a proposal to make accessibility an optional profile, and to

Re: PaceCoConstraintsAreBad

2005-04-08 Thread Robert Sayre
Walter Underwood wrote: Local textual summaries are rather common on the web. The a tag, for example. Current accessibility practice is to make the anchor text understandable out of context. In other words, to make it a summary of the linked resource. Even if the remote resource is text! For the