+1
It may be a good idea to change the descriptive text about the
examples; e.g.,
"A brief, single-entry Atom Feed Document" -> "A single-entry Atom
Feed Document that conforms to all MUST-level requirements"
"A more extensive, single-entry Atom Feed Document" -> "A single-
entry Atom Feed Document that conforms to all MUST- and SHOULD-level
requirements"
On 08/07/2005, at 6:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
I truly believe that this request is completely editorial.
I would like to request that an attempt be made to ensure that the
second "more extensive" example in section 1.1 comply with all
SHOULDs. In particular, the feed SHOULD contain a link with a
rel='self'.
If I find other deviations from the recommended practices, I'll
note them here.
- Sam Ruby
--
Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO BEA Systems
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
