I'm "pre-caching" feeds as xml files and have not added
this mime type to the server, so no, they're served as text/xml. IE7
appears to recognize them as feeds because you can see it does its re-factor of
the Atom feed as RSS2. Why does IE7 convert Atom feeds to RSS2 and use the
Atom ns in
If you quickly check the list archives you will notice that this very conversation is taking place directly with members of the IE7/RSS team. The short of it is that that MS is taking the RSS '2.0' format and extending it in areas necessary to allow for what will eventually be a 1:1 mapping, witho
I'm "pre-caching" feeds as xml files and have not added
this mime type to the server, so no, they're served as text/xml. IE7
appears to recognize them as feeds because you can see it does its re-factor of
the Atom feed as RSS2. Why does IE7 convert Atom feeds to RSS2 and use the
Atom ns in
* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-27 07:20]:
>as James Snell shows, they can be useful in entries also.
Yeah, I hadn’t thought about it in terms of styling content in
standalone aggregators, only as a hatch for XSL transforms
applied for friendlier in-browser presentation.
For the lat
Yes, I currently work around using the IRI, as mentioned, to specify the
relationship and that works fine. Re namesapces, I just think namespaces
are plentiful already and add a little more work in terms of parsing. I'm
applying them at the feed level, and as James Snell shows, they can be
usefu
correction:
serving the .xml extension as with an application/xml extension
should read: serving the .xml extension as with an application/xml MIME-type (bunch of other spelling and grammar errors, but I would rather not waste everyones time showcasing something most already know... a first take
Neat idea :)
> Why does IE7 rip out xml-stylesheet directives.
I can only assume your server is serving up the atom file (correctly) as application/atom+xml? If yes, application/atom+xml is transfered directly to the feed rendering mechanism, bypassing the xml parsing mechanism that would read t
* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-27 05:25]:
>My feeds contain a generic xml-stylesheet, which formats the
>feed for display along with a feed-specific css. Since xsl
>processors do not have a standard way to pass parameters to xsl
>stylesheets, I provide this feed-specific css to the xs
I've been experimenting with the use of rel="stylesheet" to provide a
relatively safe way of attaching styles to syndicated content. The
dangers of allowing embedded styles in syndicated content are well known
[1], however, it still makes sense to provide an optional way of
allowing publishers an
My feeds contain a
generic xml-stylesheet, which formats the feed for display along with a
feed-specific css. Since xsl processors do not have a standard way to pass
parameters to xsl stylesheets, I provide this feed-specific css to the xsl
processor in the feed as a link with rel="styleshe
10 matches
Mail list logo
