On 2006-09-08 08:21:59 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
I think the discussion around this has been absolutely excellent.
Lots of very good information and perspectives. At this point I
need to stew over things for a few days and think about how to
proceed with the extension.
The last call for
We've run across a situation where we want to annotate an atom:icon
with a title. Currently we're doing the following, as something that
Feed Validator is happy with, but doesn't feel right:
--
atom:iconuri:to/icon/atom:icon
I talked with Lisa a bit about this next week. I'll be working on
iterating the draft based on this conversation and will request another
last call once it's ready to go.
- James
Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2006-09-08 08:21:59 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
I think the discussion around this
Using extension attributes is a perfectly legitimate solution. The one
drawback is that not all implementations will support 'em.
- James
James Aylett wrote:
We've run across a situation where we want to annotate an atom:icon
with a title. Currently we're doing the following, as something
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:27:27AM -0700, James M Snell wrote:
Using extension attributes is a perfectly legitimate solution. The one
drawback is that not all implementations will support 'em.
That's not a problem, to be honest - we have (amongst other things) a
Flash 'player' for the atom
atom:icon is defined as:
atomIcon = element atom:icon {
atomCommonAttributes,
(atomUri)
}
atomCommonAttributes is defined as:
atomCommonAttributes =
attribute xml:base { atomUri }?,
attribute xml:lang { atomLanguageTag }?,
undefinedAttribute*
The
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:09:27AM -0700, James M Snell wrote:
atom:icon is defined as:
atomIcon = element atom:icon {
atomCommonAttributes,
(atomUri)
}
atomCommonAttributes is defined as:
atomCommonAttributes =
attribute xml:base { atomUri }?,
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:27 AM, James Aylett wrote:
We've run across a situation where we want to annotate an atom:icon
with a title. Currently we're doing the following, as something that
Feed Validator is happy with, but doesn't feel right:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:45 AM, James Aylett wrote:
Feed Validator gets upset with extension attributes - is it wrong?
Be specific, please? -Tim
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:36:02AM -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
let's assume myns: is declared. Then why not
icon myns:buddha-nature=high myns:sizzle=lowicon-uriicon
Apologies to all - this is what we tried first, but there must have
been a typo or something, because the feed validator started
Hi,
is anybody working on (or planning to work on) a versioning extension
for Atom? I am about to use Atom in two (considerably different)
projects that require versioning and would be happy to join forces
and contribute real (enterprise-)world use cases. (Note: not
'enterprisey' use
On 12.09.2006, at 01:23, Tim Bray wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote:
is anybody working on (or planning to work on) a versioning
extension for Atom? I am about to use Atom in two (considerably
different) projects that require versioning and would be happy to
12 matches
Mail list logo
