Does anybody have feedback on the suggestions/questions below?
If I don't get any feedback on the ABNF or validity discussions, I'll
proceed as outlined. I think there needs to be *some* feedback
regarding the link relation registry; I'm proposing substantial changes
there (my preferred
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Hmm. As far as I can tell, the *only* place where we actually define a
rule is 4.2.9.2, and that's just combining two rules by reference. I
wonder if we can save complexity here (and remove one normative
reference) by just doing this in prose; the text is currently:
[[[
