Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions

2006-10-17 Thread Eric Scheid
On 18/10/06 8:07 AM, Lisa Dusseault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Extensions When the client puts extension elements in a MER, MUST the server store those unrecognized extension elements?  I think the answer to this is actually that servers often do not and should not be required to do so. 

Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions

2006-10-17 Thread James M Snell
That bucket already exists in the form of the app:control element. entry ... x:foo / ... app:control ... x:bar / ... /app:control /entry - James Eric Scheid wrote: [snip] We did at one time discuss providing a bucket container specifically for the latter,

Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions

2006-10-17 Thread Lisa Dusseault
Yes, absolutely, a way to distinguish extensions-to-the-entry from extensions-for-the-feed would be great, even if there's a possibility that the server would reject one or both. I hadn't even considered that, must have missed that discussion. Client-to-client extensions (metadata or