On 18/10/06 8:07 AM, Lisa Dusseault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Extensions
When the client puts extension elements in a MER, MUST the server store those
unrecognized extension elements? I think the answer to this is actually that
servers often do not and should not be required to do so.
That bucket already exists in the form of the app:control element.
entry
...
x:foo /
...
app:control
...
x:bar /
...
/app:control
/entry
- James
Eric Scheid wrote:
[snip]
We did at one time discuss providing a bucket container specifically for the
latter,
Yes, absolutely, a way to distinguish extensions-to-the-entry from
extensions-for-the-feed would be great, even if there's a possibility
that the server would reject one or both. I hadn't even considered
that, must have missed that discussion. Client-to-client extensions
(metadata or