* Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-24 03:50]:
It would be helpful if every entry had a distinct atom:id. And
if the tests were valid:
http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplasmasturm.org%2Fattic%2Fatom-tests%2Fxmlbase.atom
Yeah, I should fix those. I’ve also been thinking
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Honestly, I’m a little disappointed that not more tests have been
written so far, and that is has been happening in such haphazard
fashion. Is it really because noone cares?
Well the end users probably couldn't care less. The aggregator developers
are actively hostile
* James Holderness [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-25 22:15]:
The aggregator developers are actively hostile towards such
tests.
Really? I can only think of counterexamples, though my sample is
admittedly tiny. Who are the hostile ones?
Personally, as someone who has written patches for an
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
The aggregator developers are actively hostile towards such
tests.
Really? I can only think of counterexamples, though my sample is
admittedly tiny. Who are the hostile ones?
I'm certain not all developers are hostile, but I've witnessed enough of
that kind of behaviour
http://planet.intertwingly.net/AtomConformanceTests/
It would be helpful if every entry had a distinct atom:id. And if the
tests were valid:
http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplasmasturm.org%2Fattic%2Fatom-tests%2Fxmlbase.atom
- Sam Ruby
