Re: Close the Atompub WG? (was: PROCESS QUESTION: are we done yet?)

2005-05-22 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 6:41 PM -0400 5/21/05, Robert Sayre wrote: Discussion since you sent this email indicates that the people who currently think they constitute the Atompub WG don't think they need to respect any previous consensus. s/any/some/. Agree. Sometimes people change their mind. (s/Sometimes/Quite

Close the Atompub WG? (was: PROCESS QUESTION: are we done yet?)

2005-05-21 Thread Robert Sayre
On 5/20/05, Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the WG want to be able to open up new topics, or re-open old topics with a twist? If so, do we all agree to the delay in publication that comes with that? Also, how long should this opening and re-opening last? Are there any limits on