Section 6.4:
The RNGs in this section require Extension Elements to be in a
namespace that isn't the Atom namespace. This requirement is missing
from the text.
Just a note:
This proposal doesn't rehash the
extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes thread [1], because it
only applies
Section 6.4:
The RNGs in this section require Extension Elements to be in a
namespace that isn't the Atom namespace. This requirement is missing
from the text.
Proposal
Add to section 6.4.1:
A Simple Extension Element MUST be namespace-qualified. The element
MUST be defined
David Powell wrote:
Section 6.4:
The RNGs in this section require Extension Elements to be in a
namespace that isn't the Atom namespace. This requirement is missing
from the text.
It's actually worse than just that.
Section 6.1 defines foreign markup as being markup from other
On 5/24/05, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Powell wrote:
Section 6.4:
The RNGs in this section require Extension Elements to be in a
namespace that isn't the Atom namespace. This requirement is missing
from the text.
It's actually worse than just that.
Actually, I
