Re the type parameter (sec. 12): I earlier suggested to define file
extensions for feed and entry documents, and that suggestion got some
+1s and no objections.
Let me reiterate points:
1. If the "different processing models" models require we be able to
distinguish feeds from entries by mime t
On 2/13/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> ...
Hmmm, didn't we have agreement to change 'application/atomserv+xml' to
'application/atomsvc+xml'?
A consensus call was as
I was going to say ship it but I noticed one major problem: the
app:categories element is defined twice: once in section 7 and again in
8.2.5. I realize that these are different contexts (e.g. categories as a
standalone doc vs. an element in the service doc) but it's entirely
unnecessary to define
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
...
Hmmm, didn't we have agreement to change 'application/atomserv+xml' to
'application/atomsvc+xml'?
Best regards, Julian
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Atom Publishing Format and Protocol Working
Group of the IETF.
Title : The Atom Publishing Protocol
Author(s) : B. de Hora, J. Gregorio
Filenam
