On Jan 27, 2005, at 19:30, Antone Roundy wrote:
Given how common it is even for us, when posting examples of content
type=XHTML without declaring the XHTML namespace, might it be a
good idea to specify a mandatory method of declaring the XHTML
namespace to ensure that implementors don't forget?
On 28/1/05 7:39 AM, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the value of type is XHTML, the content of the Text construct
MUST be a single xhtml:div element
-1 gratuitous element cruft. The text construct element itself serves
as a container.
but atom:title != xhtml:title
also, are
On 28/1/05 4:58 PM, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a:copyright type='XHTML'Copyright 2005 John Doe, h:emall rights
reserved/h:em/a:copyright
(assuming 'a' to be bound to the Atom namespace and 'h' to the XHTML
namespace) is less crufty than
a:copyright type='XHTML'div
On Jan 28, 2005, at 01:38, Eric Scheid wrote:
On 28/1/05 7:39 AM, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the value of type is XHTML, the content of the Text construct
MUST be a single xhtml:div element
-1 gratuitous element cruft. The text construct element itself serves
as a container.
but
