Robert, can you take a stab at updating section 1.2 for this Pace?
I'll also note that this example is not valid. It does not contain
either a summary or content element.
One thing to consider is to do like what was done in Atom 0.3 [1]:
provide both a minimal and maximal example.
- Sam Ruby
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert, can you take a stab at updating section 1.2 for this Pace?
Yes, but the Pace is complete without it.
I'll also note that this example is not valid. It does not contain
either a summary or content element.
Hmm. How do I do a linkblog with this restriction?
Robert Sayre
Robert Sayre wrote:
Hmm. How do I do a linkblog with this restriction?
I believe a linkblog should always have atom:content which provides some
information on the reason why you posted the link or a comment on the
link or something similar.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Robert Sayre wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert, can you take a stab at updating section 1.2 for this Pace?
Yes, but the Pace is complete without it.
It would be much easier to discuss the pace with an example.
I gather that a format-05 compatible feed, thus:
feed
entry
head.../head
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert Sayre wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert, can you take a stab at updating section 1.2 for this Pace?
Yes, but the Pace is complete without it.
It would be much easier to discuss the pace with an example.
I suspect that once people see some examples, objections will surface.
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert Sayre wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Robert, can you take a stab at updating section 1.2 for this Pace?
Yes, but the Pace is complete without it.
It would be much easier to discuss the pace with an example.
I gather that a format-05 compatible feed, thus:
I suspect that once
Robert Sayre wrote:
I suspect that once people see some examples, objections will surface.
I've included an example of each approach, so people can compare the two
methods. I have not positioned them as spec text. The spec requires more
examples no matter which approach the WG chooses.
Good
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm recommending AtomAsRDF and PaceFeedRecursive for closure merely
because they are incomplete. If they become complete, I will update
their status accordingly.
Please do.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Unfortunately, I have a paper deadline on Tuesday and can't
procrastinate any
