Re: PaceFeedState status

2005-02-03 Thread Mark Nottingham
I'm OK with dropping wholefeed; I'll edit the pace to accommodate that. WRT warning users; you realise that putting something in the user manual, README or box of the consumer (e.g., This product does not manage feed state.) would satisfy that requirement? Would SHOULD make you feel better?

Re: PaceFeedState status

2005-01-24 Thread Antone Roundy
On Monday, January 24, 2005, at 06:09 PM, Joe Gregorio wrote: I am +1 on the //atom:head/atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'prev'], but -1 on //atom:head/atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'wholefeed'] and -1 on any of the verbage that makes demands on clients, for example, Atom consumers MUST warn users when they do not