-1 I agree. Recursion can be placed in the model. It does not
need to be in the syntax. In any case this is too big a change
too late in the game.
Henry
On 7 Feb 2005, at 21:08, Antone Roundy wrote:
-1: recursion is too complex and bulky.
PaceEntriesElement
-1
Robert Sayre wrote:
1. XML containment relates feed and entry metadata to the data being
described, thereby defining a consistent model for future extension
elements;
I'm dubious about this claim. XML containment has even less semantic
grist to it than UML aggregation. My sense is when we get
Bill de hÓra wrote:
2. Multiple feeds can be aggregated and presented using a single data
format without having to modify the entries within those feeds to
incorporate their original feed metadata;
That sounds like a win.
3. Digital signatures can be safely applied to feeds and entries
A few quick comments before I transition out of the office and head towards
home:
In principle I am +1 for pretty much any spec that has the potential of
unifying entries and feeds, and feel even more strongly for those that also
unify comments and trackbacks with entries and feeds. A number of
