On Sunday, May 22, 2005, at 07:14 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 2:11 AM -0400 5/21/05, Bob Wyman wrote:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry.
+1. I can live with Tim's original wording because the phrase that
At 2:11 AM -0400 5/21/05, Bob Wyman wrote:
Tim Bray directs the editors to insert the following words:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and Atom Processors
MUST treat them as such.
It is a long
On 5/22/05, Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:11 AM -0400 5/21/05, Bob Wyman wrote:
Tim Bray directs the editors to insert the following words:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and Atom
On May 22, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value
appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and Atom
Processors
MUST treat them as such.
It is a long standing and valued tradition in the IETF that
Tim Bray directs the editors to insert the following words:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and Atom Processors
MUST treat them as such.
It is a long standing and valued tradition in the IETF
On May 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
---
The editors are directed to modify
the phrase which starts If multiple atom:entry elements... as
follows:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and
---
The editors are directed to modify
the phrase which starts If multiple atom:entry elements... as
follows:
If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear in
an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and software MUST
treat them as such.
