* Henri Sivonen wrote:
I'm wondering which validator was used for testing the Atom
RNG+Schematron schema. Which validators support Compact Syntax with
embedded Schematron? I am particularly interested in Java solutions.
http://www.topologi.com/products/validator/ is said to support it.
--
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:24 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Henri Sivonen wrote:
I'm wondering which validator was used for testing the Atom
RNG+Schematron schema. Which validators support Compact Syntax with
embedded Schematron? I am particularly interested in Java solutions.
/ Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I'm wondering which validator was used for testing the Atom
| RNG+Schematron schema. Which validators support Compact Syntax with
| embedded Schematron? I am particularly interested in Java solutions.
I use Kohsuke's MSV. (msv.dev.java.net)
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:16 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I'm wondering which validator was used for testing the Atom
| RNG+Schematron schema. Which validators support Compact Syntax with
| embedded Schematron? I am particularly interested in
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-12 02:00]:
The second extension is a comments link type that allows an
entry to be associated with a separate feed containing
comments. […]
feed
entry
link rel=comments href=http://example.com/commentsfeed.xml; /
/entry
On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, at 12:42 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-12 02:00]:
The second extension is a comments link type that allows an
entry to be associated with a separate feed containing
comments. […]
feed
entry
link rel=comments
* Bill de hÓra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-11 17:55]:
[[[
Interoperability considerations: Some existing agents and feeds
that support the Atom 0.3 specification make use of this media
type despite Atom 0.3 not being compatible with Atom 1.0. Such
feeds SHOULD be considered invalid Atom 1.0.
Great thoughts... exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for.
What you describe is actually the way we currently integrate comments
into feeds in the internal IBM blogging infrastructure: Entries and
Comments are integrated into a single feed. Currently there is no way
of associating
* Antone Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-12 21:25]:
If you're already creating an extension link type, why not
throw in an additional attribute too to help with that:
feed xmlns:comments=http://example.org/commentfeed;
entry
link rel=comments
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-12 21:55]:
What you describe is actually the way we currently integrate
comments into feeds in the internal IBM blogging
infrastructure: Entries and Comments are integrated into a
single feed.
Great to know that there’s precedent for this as well
Ok, distilled from this conversation...
1. Comments can either be included directly within the feed or in a
separate feed.
2. Comment entries are distinguished by a link @rel=in-reply-to
@href={$original-entry/atom:id}
3. Comment feeds may be indicated using a link @rel=comments
James M Snell wrote:
Ok, distilled from this conversation...
1. Comments can either be included directly within the feed or in a
separate feed.
2. Comment entries are distinguished by a link @rel=in-reply-to
@href={$original-entry/atom:id}
As an atom:id is an identifier that might
James: Given that this kind of thing is pretty near-n-dear to me, I'm
quite interested. A couple observations and/or thoughts:
(1) I like this much, much better than the proposed ThreadsML mess of
years past. Simple is good.
(2) Implementation might be a hard sell, so don't get your hopes too
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-12 23:20]:
1. Comments can either be included directly within the feed or in a
separate feed.
2. Comment entries are distinguished by a link @rel=in-reply-to
@href={$original-entry/atom:id}
3. Comment feeds may be indicated using a link
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Hmm. That’s a nice thought that hadn’t occured to me. Thinking
about it, that would offer a way to solve a lot of the mess that
currently plagues the Trackback/Pingback mechanisms. You could
just ping the target weblog with a pointer to the feed which
contains the entry you
Roger B. wrote:
James: Given that this kind of thing is pretty near-n-dear to me, I'm
quite interested. A couple observations and/or thoughts:
(1) I like this much, much better than the proposed ThreadsML mess of
years past. Simple is good.
Absolutely.
(2) Implementation might be a
On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, at 06:21 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-13 00:00]:
As an atom:id is an identifier that might (should?) not be
dereferenceable, atom:link is not a good choice.
There is nothing in the spec that forbids atom:link
That should be
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
@rel=related-feed ??? A bit more specific than related,
the nature of the relation is left unspecified. User agents
can choose to handle in whatever way they wish.
That doesn’t seem to confer more meaning than you can already
express by [EMAIL PROTECTED]'related'
18 matches
Mail list logo
