On 10/4/05 12:52 AM, Eric Scheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could it be reasonable that an empty element gets displayed as empty, but an
absent element triggers a fall back mechanism (eg. use the summary
element, and if that is missing display the link rel=alternate resource?
The first RSS
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:28:40PM +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
2) Section 4.1.3.3 Item 2
The text:
for example, br as lt;br.
Is this right? Should it be:
for example, br as lt;brgt;.
We don't need to escape the in text content, as far as I can tell.
Correct.
* James Aylett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-10 11:55]:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:06:00PM -0400, Robert Sayre wrote:
* the atom:entry contains an atom:content that has a src
attribute (and is thus empty).
FWIW, for clarity I would favour:
'... has a src attribute (and is thus itself
On Apr 10, 2005, at 2:30 AM, James Aylett wrote:
OTOH since someone has asked the question who presumably is fairly
knowledgable about XML, and most people people are not, would it be
worth putting a brief comment pointing to the appropriate section of
the XML TR?
Note that in XML the right angle
Bill de hra wrote:
...
** ABNF
Drop.
...
reason: ABNF is used in one place:
4.2.9.2 The rel Attribute, p1
and referred to in 3.3. It's incidental enough to be dropped.
I agree with this one now. The other specs use the older ABNF spec anyway.
** Figures
Please add figure captions for all samples,
Robert Sayre wrote:
Bill de hra wrote:
...
** ABNF
Drop.
...
reason: ABNF is used in one place:
4.2.9.2 The rel Attribute, p1
and referred to in 3.3. It's incidental enough to be dropped.
I agree with this one now. The other specs use the older ABNF spec anyway.
** Figures
Please add figure
