Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
As far as I, support for Content-Location was reverted because in Firefox
same-document references are broken when used with some sort of base URI.
I.e. if you have a document with with Content-Location:
http://y/z, Firefox will go to the anchor named x in the document
> Hosting is not the point.Yep. 'tis why I said the word "backup".On 3/31/06, A. Pagaltzis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-01 03:15]:> Obviously the main wiki would be better, but if this can act as> a backup plan, then let me know if and when and I wil
I also understand there is some debate whether supporting
Content-Location is a good idea at all (at least in web browsers).
Firefox at one point started adding support, but they determined that it
caused problems with broken servers (mostly IIS I believe).
As far as I, support for Content-
