Content and Summary Test
http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=316 When some feed readers see an entry that has a atom:content with base64 content AND an atom:summary with text, for some reason they choose to show the raw base64. Test feed here: http://www.snellspace.com/public/contentsummary.xml - James
Weekly Posting Summary
Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 19.44% |7 | 41.09% | 100373 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.11% |4 | 12.86% |31414 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.11% |4 | 9.60% |23444 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13.89% |5 | 6.06% |14807 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.11% |4 | 4.91% |12001 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8.33% |3 | 4.44% |10857 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.78% |1 | 7.25% |17717 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5.56% |2 | 4.21% |10293 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5.56% |2 | 3.97% | 9707 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.78% |1 | 1.59% | 3895 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.78% |1 | 1.59% | 3876 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.78% |1 | 1.24% | 3041 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.78% |1 | 1.17% | 2869 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--++--+ 100.00% | 36 |100.00% | 244294 | Total -- Robert Sayre I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.
Re: Content and Summary Test
James M Snell wrote: When some feed readers see an entry that has a atom:content with base64 content AND an atom:summary with text, for some reason they choose to show the raw base64. Yeah, I noticed that when I was testing our image content support. Most feed readers (I tested about a dozen or so) either showed the raw base64 or nothing at all. One couldn't parse my test feed at all when it contained base64-encoded content. Why am I not surprised? Btw, were your tests meant to be using a media type of applcation/xml (note the missing 'i')? Regards James
Re: Content and Summary Test
James Holderness wrote: [snip] Yeah, I noticed that when I was testing our image content support. Most feed readers (I tested about a dozen or so) either showed the raw base64 or nothing at all. One couldn't parse my test feed at all when it contained base64-encoded content. Why am I not surprised? I don't have access to a Windows box right now... how does snarfer do on these tests? Btw, were your tests meant to be using a media type of applcation/xml (note the missing 'i')? Oops. Fixed. - James
