Autodiscovery Draft

[James M Snell]

I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to
go anywhere.  My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
again without any further modifications.

- James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

[James M Snell]

The autodisco draft originally authored by Mark Pilgrim and resurrected
by me late last year.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-autodiscovery-00.txt

- James

Jan Algermissen wrote:
 James,
 
 what draft do you refer to?
 
 Thanks,
 Jan
 
 On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote:
 

 I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
 moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to
 go anywhere.  My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
 again without any further modifications.

 - James

 
 

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

[Jan Algermissen]

James,

what draft do you refer to?

Thanks,
Jan

On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote:



I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not  
going to

go anywhere.  My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
again without any further modifications.

- James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

[John Panzer]

There were strong suggestions at the time, I think, that this was part 
of HTML and should belong to the WHAT-WG.


So is there a WHAT-WG document to look at?

Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with 
a feed?  (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover 
feeds, there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not 
clear on what that would be.  I do think that collection autodisco is 
important.)


-John

James M Snell wrote:

The autodisco draft originally authored by Mark Pilgrim and resurrected
by me late last year.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-autodiscovery-00.txt

- James

Jan Algermissen wrote:
  

James,

what draft do you refer to?

Thanks,
Jan

On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote:



I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to
go anywhere.  My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
again without any further modifications.

- James

  



  

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

[James M Snell]

John Panzer wrote:
 [snip]
 Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with
 a feed?  (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover
 feeds, there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not
 clear on what that would be.  I do think that collection autodisco is
 important.)

An app:collection element can appear within atom:feed and atom:source
elements.

- James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

[Eric Scheid]

On 20/3/07 9:00 AM, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with a
 feed?  (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover feeds,
 there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not clear on what
 that would be.  I do think that collection autodisco is important.)

please remember that there may be multiple collections collated into one
feed ... and that various members of one collection may be represented in
many different feeds.

it's not 1:1.

e.