On 5/5/05, Andy Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
convincing the WG, I would simply point out that a mechanism widely
available to, and understood by, feed providers and aggregators cannot do
harm and has the potential to do a great deal of good.
Not to be flippant, but we have one that's
On 5/5/05, Walter Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need the information outside of HTTP. To quote from the RSS spec
for ttl:
This makes it possible for RSS sources to be managed by a file-sharing
network such as Gnutella.
Ignoring, for the moment, that this is a horrible idea and
On 5/5/05, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seriously expect it to be interpreted as a promise that the feed
won't change for the next x minutes?
No, but I do seriously expect it to be interpreted that the feed
publisher does not wish clients to check it for the next x minutes.
--
Cheers,
On 5/5/05, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume an HTTP Expires header for Atom content will work and play well
with caches such as the Google Accelerator
(http://webaccelerator.google.com/). I'd also guess that a syntax-level
tag won't. Is this important?
Yes, and yes. This is
On 5/5/05, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The discussion in recent days has been lively but unstructured. If I
were forced to make a consensus call right now, I'm pretty sure I
wouldn't be able to pick out any one spec change that I could say
clearly has consensus.
The one suggestion I
On 5/8/05, Bob Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, let me say that I am a *very* strong supporter of
intellectual property rights... I have always made my income by selling my
intellectual property and I consider the anti-IPR proponents and Free
Software evangelists to be no better
On 5/9/05, Nikolas Coukouma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAnchorSupport
Autodicovery elements MAY appear in either the head or the body
of the document.
I believe this is incorrect. IIRC, link elements may only appear in
the head, and a elements may only
On 5/19/05, Isofarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd urge that the wording here should also include accessibility
concerns, especially to encourage accessible alternatives to to be
adopted when the content is known to be inaccessible - e.g. images,
sound files, movies, flash.
HTML for
On 5/24/05, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Validation is something very precise. It can be validated against a
DTD, or against a Schema or another grammar language, etc. At least
the Feed validator could become a Feed checker which develops a
heuristic to check if the requirements of
On 8/25/05, Roger B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mhh. I have not looked into this. But is not every desktop aggregator
a robot?
Henry: Depends on who you ask. (See the Newsmonster debates from a
couple years ago.)
As I am the one who kicked off the Newsmonster debates a couple years
ago, I
On 8/26/05, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(And before you say but my aggregator is nothing but a podcast
client, and the feeds are nothing but links to enclosures, so it's
obvious that the publisher wanted me to download them -- WRONG! The
publisher might want that, or they might not
11 matches
Mail list logo
