2006/3/24, James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Do I change in-reply-to id=... / to in-reply-to ref=... / ?
+0.5, I have no real problem with id but as it seems to bother some people…
and.. to address David's concerns about extending atom:link...
2. Do I change thr:count and thr:when to
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-24 21:30]:
1. Do I change in-reply-to id=... / to in-reply-to ref=... / ?
+1, in case my implicit vote isn’t already counted.
2. Do I change thr:count and thr:when to extension elements
instead of attributes on atom:link?
+0; but I don’t plan on using
Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
Hi James,
For me it's a matter of the fact that the spec has gone through 6
revisions and two design overhauls since it was first pitched. It's
been out there for quite a while. At some point, the design discussions
need to end and it needs to stablize so
James M Snell wrote:
1. Do I change in-reply-to id=... / to in-reply-to ref=... / ?
I don't know enough to care what you call those attributes. And it's a long
way before we'll go live with anything so if you need to change attribute
names it wouldn't bother me in the least.
2. Do I
