Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-form at-05.txt

On Jan 31, 2005, at 16:05, Julian Reschke wrote: Can't we just get rid of the defaulting? That would make the spec simpler with little additional verbosity in the instance documents. If there is no default, someone will still omit the attribute and consumers will try to cope. I think it is better

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-form at-05.txt

On Jan 30, 2005, at 11:58 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote: I don't want to refer to OASIS's URLs. Why not? Will ISO-Relax NG be available on the Web free of charge? Specs that are available free of charge on the Web win. Indeed. And what's wrong with OASIS URL's? -Tim

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-form at-05.txt

Henri Sivonen wrote: On Jan 31, 2005, at 00:53, Robert Sayre wrote: I think this should come with the following URL: I don't want to refer to OASIS's URLs. Why not? Will ISO-Relax NG be available on the Web free of charge? Specs

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-form at-05.txt

On Jan 31, 2005, at 00:53, Robert Sayre wrote: I think this should come with the following URL: I don't want to refer to OASIS's URLs. Why not? Will ISO-Relax NG be available on the Web free of charge? Specs that are available fr

Re: Comments on draft 05, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-form at-05.txt

On Jan 31, 2005, at 01:32, Sam Ruby wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Less: < (hope I got these right). This is not only right, but also a good example of why many people would prefer to have another element so that they don't have to deal with prefixes: Their seri