This is now PaceNoFeedState;
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceNoFeedState
On Jan 31, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
x. Managing Feed State
Atom Processors MAY keep state (e.g., metadata in atom:head, entries)
sourced from Atom Feed Documents and combine them with other Atom
On 4/2/05 4:03 PM, Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is now PaceNoFeedState;
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceNoFeedState
+1
e.
On 1/2/05 4:18 PM, Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Feed Document may be somewhat misleading, because it's easy to
confuse it with Feed (which has connotations of the information
channel). I think Feed Snapshot Document or the like was once
proposed, but it was shot down.
Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 5:18:44 AM, you wrote:
P.S. Feed Document may be somewhat misleading, because it's easy to
confuse it with Feed (which has connotations of the information
channel). I think Feed Snapshot Document or the like was once
proposed, but it was shot down. *shrug*
In
On Jan 31, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
PaceFeedState:
If no further discussion: Like PaceSupersede, this model of publishing
does not (so far) enjoy consensus support.
Partially pro: 2
Contra: 0
Conclusion: Not enough interest. Close it.
If this is the direction we go in on this, that's
At 08:46 05/02/01, Mark Nottingham wrote:
[[[
x. Managing Feed State
Atom Processors MAY keep state (e.g., metadata in atom:head, entries)
sourced from Atom Feed Documents and combine them with other Atom Feed
Documents, in order to facilitate a contiguous view of the contents of the
feed. The