PaceExtendingAtom status

2005-01-24 Thread Tim Bray 
If there were no further discussion: This is the result of a lot of 
discussion around Must Ignore and has in various drafts received lots 
of friendly remarks and suggestions for improvement, which have been 
incorporated.  Absent some convincing -1s, it probably goes in.  -Tim

Re: PaceExtendingAtom status

2005-01-24 Thread Joe Gregorio 

+1 for making Atom a 'Must Ignore' language.


On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:17:46 -0800, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 If there were no further discussion: This is the result of a lot of
 discussion around Must Ignore and has in various drafts received lots
 of friendly remarks and suggestions for improvement, which have been
 incorporated.  Absent some convincing -1s, it probably goes in.  -Tim
 
 


-- 
Joe Gregoriohttp://bitworking.org