Re: PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

[Paul Hoffman]

-1. IETF documents have to have a Security Considerations section 
that describes general security issues. In no cases that I know of do 
they contain protocol specification. See RFC 3552 for more info.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Re: PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

[Bill de hÓra]

Paul Hoffman wrote:
-1. IETF documents have to have a Security Considerations section that 
describes general security issues. In no cases that I know of do they 
contain protocol specification. See RFC 3552 for more info.
Is that -1 to the proposed title or -1 to having one section?
cheers
Bill

Re: PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

[Paul Hoffman]

At 5:09 PM + 2/7/05, Bill de hÓra wrote:
Paul Hoffman wrote:
-1. IETF documents have to have a Security Considerations section 
that describes general security issues. In no cases that I know of 
do they contain protocol specification. See RFC 3552 for more info.
Is that -1 to the proposed title or -1 to having one section?
The latter. In IETF documents, there should be a section that tells 
you how to do security, and another section that shows the bigger 
picture about security (such as known threats, other interesting 
security work, and so on).

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Re: PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

[Bill de hÓra]

Paul Hoffman wrote:
The latter. In IETF documents, there should be a section that tells you 
how to do security, and another section that shows the bigger picture 
about security (such as known threats, other interesting security work, 
and so on).
I can tell this isn't worth arguing about :) I've withdrawn the pace and 
notified Sam.

cheers
Bill

Re: PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

[Eric Scheid]

 PaceJoinSectionSixAndTen

-1