This one shouldn't, in my opinion, be on our active-discussion queue,
because it's uncooked. That is to say, it doesn't actually propose
specific changes to our format or protocol drafts.
Having said that, the thinking seems usefully clean and minimal, and I
wouldn't be surprised if a real
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PacePropertyDesign
* Simple
The content of the element MUST be CDATA, and have no attributes.
Perhaps character data instead of CDATA would be better, as a quick
reading might be taken to imply that the content must be in ![CDATA[
]].
* RDF Resource
I never finished this Pace, and it can be considered withdrawn.
Robert Sayre
Antone Roundy wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PacePropertyDesign
* Simple
The content of the element MUST be CDATA, and have no attributes.
Perhaps character data instead of CDATA would be better
