On 8/15/05, Bob Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest that the Introduction cover atom:source in the recommended
section and highlight the case in which it is recommended.
Disagree. The introduction is for newbies. Folks implementing
synthetic feed services (the case in which it is
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers
Sent: 02 August 2005 14:09
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format
Looks great.
My only suggestion would be to expose the MUSTs etc. little
more, especially where Atom differees from
On 2 Aug 2005, at 5:41 am, James Cerra wrote:
id
http://example.com/
/id
idhttp://example.com//id
Those are different ids (Processors MUST compare atom:id elements on
a character-by-character basis), and the first is just plain
invalid. Why on earth would you think otherwise?
(oh,
Looks great.
My only suggestion would be to expose the MUSTs etc. little more,
especially where Atom differees from RSS. E.g. right now it would be
easy for someone coming from RSS 2.0 to think that id was the same
as guid.
So in this case maybe:
Identifies the feed in a universally unique and
Sam Ruby annoyed us with:
http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/
Feedback welcome.
Interesting examples. I'm probably missing a few things, so any clarifications
filling the gaps in my head would be appreciated! :-)
From the Atom spec that I scanned (10) it is unclear if
Sam: I've only given it a quick skim, but at first blush, I think it
looks great.
--
Roger Benningfield
On 8/1/05, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/
Feedback welcome.
- Sam Ruby
