Did this need a Pace? It seems to have got fairly unanimous support.
Graham
On 2 Feb 2005, at 3:37 pm, Graham wrote:
Any chance of renaming atom:tagline to atom:subtitle? The two sample
feeds posted today have the taglines ongoing fragmented essay by Tim
Bray and WebDAV related news. Aren't
At 12:53 AM + 2/8/05, Graham wrote:
Did this need a Pace? It seems to have got fairly unanimous support.
No pace needed for editorial changes such as renaming elements or
attributes if there is good agreement. The editors know full well if
they make a change that angers the WG, the
/ Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Any chance of renaming atom:tagline to atom:subtitle? The two sample
| feeds posted today have the taglines ongoing fragmented essay by Tim
| Bray and WebDAV related news. Aren't taglines meant to be funny or
| catchy or clever?
+1
Why not go one step further in generality and call the tagline the
summary? Then we will be closer
to the point I had been making in PaceEntriesAllTheWayDown2, and one
step closer to showing that
a Feed head is the same structure as an Entry. Or if you go the
Fielding way with the recursive
On Wednesday, February 2, 2005, at 09:49 AM, Henry Story wrote:
Why not go one step further in generality and call the tagline the
summary? Then we will be closer
to the point I had been making in PaceEntriesAllTheWayDown2, and one
step closer to showing that
a Feed head is the same structure
On 2 Feb 2005, at 18:09, Antone Roundy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 2, 2005, at 09:49 AM, Henry Story wrote:
Why not go one step further in generality and call the tagline the
summary? Then we will be closer
to the point I had been making in PaceEntriesAllTheWayDown2, and one
step closer to
+1.
Subtitle is less obscure, and as Graham suggests could reasonably
encompass tagline. Summary isn't far away, but subtitle and tagline
are both more suggestive of the kind of half-a-sentence people use in
this position, rather than a paragraph+.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:37:09 +, Graham
+1.
Subtitle is less obscure, and as Graham suggests could reasonably
encompass tagline. Summary isn't far away, but subtitle and
tagline are both more suggestive of the kind of half-a-sentence
people use in this position, rather than a paragraph+.
Relatively minor part of the spec, but I
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:55:06 -0800, Walter Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or description instead of tagline. subtitle sounds like a
formatting directive to me, print this smaller and below the title.
description feels too vague.
This is one case where description and summary
