Potential Issue: Section 4.2.2 atom:link

2004-12-07 Thread James Snell
or not but it did strike me as being potentially problematic. -- - James Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Atom Notification Protocol Published

2004-12-20 Thread James Snell
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:34:18 -0500, Bob Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Snell wrote: For XMPP-enabled environments, draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-01 is Goodness. Not every environment is going to be XMPP-enabled. Just about everyone is HTTP POST enabled. I think

Re: Please Review: Dissemination of Earthquake / Tsunami data via Atom

2005-01-17 Thread James Snell
core. On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:00:39 +, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: um... cancel messages? look, errors or state change repudiation is latent in all reported state. why un-write when you can later-write? -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com

Atom Notification Protocol Update

2005-01-31 Thread James Snell
To reiterate the prior discussion that happened on this, I am not intending this as a competitor to Atom-XMPP. I think both have their place and both contribute to the General Good. I would appreciate folks giving this a look over and offering any comments you may have. -- - James Snell http

Re: PaceCollection

2005-02-02 Thread James Snell
-- this is really just a job for the editor, i hope. *s/atom:feed/atom:collection/ *s/Atom Feed Document/Atom Collection Document/ }}} == Impacts == none. it's just a name change. == Notes == CategoryProposals -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL

Re: Call for final Paces for consideration: deadline imminent

2005-02-02 Thread James Snell
link href=... type=application/atom+xml rel=comments / link href=... type=application/atom+xml rel=trackbacks / link href=... type=application/atom+xml rel=parts / e. -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Atom for Archives (was:Re: Call for final Paces for consideration: deadline imminent)

2005-02-02 Thread James Snell
Comments below.. On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:27:33 +1100, Eric Scheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/2/05 5:09 PM, James Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the model for archiving with Atom? One or more distinct Atom feeds that each contain a collection of old entries? If so, what we

ServiceElement and other matters

2005-02-02 Thread James Snell
through of the -05 draft. Maybe more later. -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Thinking ahead: Atom Extension Proposals on the Wiki?

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
I will start working on the template this week and will get something posted by the weekend. On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:46:14 +0100, Danny Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 20:27:28 -0500, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Snell wrote: I'm just thinking ahead a bit

Re: CAP over Atom (PubSub Common Alerting Protocol Earthquake Feeds...)

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
. Your comments and/or suggestions would be appreciated. bob wyman -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: On organization and abstraction

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
, temporary flashback to past hell. Sorry Bob, VB was an excellent product, I just was forced to be witness to some extremely bad uses of it. Nightmares, I tell you, nightmares!) bob wyman -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PaceRemoveInfoAndHost

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
://www.mnot.net/ -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Organization Use Cases (was: Re: Format spec vs Protocol spec)

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
on. Get version one out the door. Get folks to start implementing it. Start writing up extensions. Get folks to implement those extensions. Figure out which extensions are Really Useful. Add those Really Useful Extensions to the core later. -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com

New Pace: PaceAggregationInSeparateSpec

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
simple == Notes == -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Pace: PaceAggregationInSeparateSpec

2005-02-03 Thread James Snell
to be atom:head, but it does need to be part of the core. Robert Sayre -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Pace: PaceAggregationInSeparateSpec

2005-02-04 Thread James Snell
to would be part of the metadata of the entry and so be a legitimate way of creating special selection of entries. Henry Story -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PaceProfile - new

2005-02-04 Thread James Snell
/ -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]