Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Gerard Braad
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Micah Abbott wrote: > I think Joe is referencing this - > http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2016/03/introducing-atomic-devmode/ This is not an option using 'vagrant up' ;-) But yes, for a single node installation without vagrant, this is of

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Micah Abbott
I think Joe is referencing this - http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2016/03/introducing-atomic-devmode/ On 12/07/2016 07:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Right, but we also specifically have a developer mode for Atomic Host. Not just for OpenShift but generally for anybody who wants to work on

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Stephen Milner
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:22:26PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and >> re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Right, but we also specifically have a developer mode for Atomic Host. Not just for OpenShift but generally for anybody who wants to work on containers without pulling everything to their desktop. On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Gerard Braad wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:34

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Gerard Braad
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> A single node can get you a taste of docker or origin or kube, esp if >> you're on Windows or OS X. You could develop for a legit cluster using a >> single node vm. > You can kick it into developer mode, right? That would

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > A single node can get you a taste of docker or origin or kube, esp if > you're on Windows or OS X. You could develop for a legit cluster using a > single node vm. > You can kick it into developer mode, right? That would

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-07 Thread Brian Exelbierd
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 04:22 AM, Jason Brooks wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2016 17:22, "Josh Berkus" wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and >> re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-06 Thread Gerard Braad
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > 3) Is Vagrant really where we want to direct people as a quickstart > option? I'm asking because I'm not that clear on what users can *do* > with an single atomic node on vagrant. With the right documentation, yes. It is

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-06 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:22:26PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and > re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for > structure: > > > * Introduction > * Installation > * Vagrant > * Public Cloud

[atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

2016-12-06 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for structure: * Introduction * Installation * Vagrant * Public Cloud * ISO * Others * Quick Start * Links to