Hi Brent,
Thanks for your inputs. Responses are inline.
On 18/10, Brent Baude wrote:
> Hi Dharmit,
>
> Comments inline. Feel free to grab me on irc (nick: baude) and we can
> discuss further.
I'm guessing it's #atomic on Freenode. But I couldn't find you there.
You are available during US East Coast time?
>
> On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 18:58 +0530, Dharmit Shah wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working on writing atomic scanner and would like to invoke them
> > from
> > a python program. However, I couldn't find documentation about it.
> > Also,
> > looking at the `Atomic/scan.py` and specifically scan function in
> > that
> > file, it seems like it is designed to be used from CLI only.
> >
>
> Documentation:
>
> https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic/blob/master/README-atomic-scan.
> md
> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/05/02/introducing-atomic-scan-co
> ntainer-vulnerability-detection/
> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/05/20/creating-a-custom-atomic-s
> can-plug-in/
>
> The latter two are a bit dated but the core should still be correct.
>
I've already created a scanner based on the last link. And we're in the
process of adding more.
>
> > At the moment, we're using Python's `subprocess` module to invoke
> > `atomic scan` commands and then parse its output to figure the
> > location
> > where scanner would have output the file(s). Then we parse the json
> > files and carry out tasks like notifying a user if there's something
> > that needs to be worked upon based on the scan results. This doesn't
> > seem to be a good way to go about it since any change in the way
> > `atomic
> > scan` outputs to stdout would cause things to break on our end.
> >
>
> Have you tried using dbus to drive atomic scan. This should work and
> if it doesn't, I'll fix it.
>
I've not worked on dbus earlier. I'll go through it and try to figure a
way to execute atomic scan through it. However, I'm not sure what to
expect in response.
In case you have some tip(s) or reference doc or an example of using
dbus to call atomic scan, then please share it with me.
TBH, I find its jargon a bit complicated and am trying to understand it
better.
> > It'd be helpful if we can, instead of using `subprocess` module, have
> > Python interface to invoke the scanner. This would make it simpler to
> > know where the scan results got stored and directly access them.
> > Also,
> > is it possible to tell atomic scanner to use a specific file to
> > output
> > the results? I checked `atomic scan --help` but couldn't find one.
> >
>
> The output files are pre-ordained. However, there was another user
> asking for something somewhat similar. I have asked for an example but
> haven't gotten a response. Keep in mind that specifying an output
> directory is probably more realistic.
>
I think you're talking about [1]. I agree on the output directory part.
In case a scanner's going to distribute its output across multiple
files, it makes more sense to be able to specify a target directory.
[1] https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic/issues/577
Regards,
Dharmit.
> > Thanks,
> > Dharmit.
> >
