Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: >> I also feel that having to specify the version fedora during the pull >> is not a very nice user experience. (ie docker pull >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

On Mar 20, 2018 5:24 AM, "Clement Verna" wrote: Thanks all for the feedbacks, I am 100% behind the idea that, the end user does not care about which fedora base image is used (as long as he trust that patch and security fixes are applied). If I want to use the nginx

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Container Release

Thanks for the note Clement. Inline... On Mar 19, 2018 4:31 PM, "Colin Walters" wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > So if you maintain a container could you please build your container > against the f28 and master branch. There's a fairly

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup

Works for me. -- Thanks, Steve Milner Atomic | Red Hat | http://projectatomic.io/ On Feb 21, 2018 1:58 PM, "Jason Brooks" <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Chris

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Chris Negus wrote: > Red Hat has been phasing out support for manually setting up vanilla > Kubernetes on RHEL and RHEL Atomic. While there are still procedures for > setting up Kubernetes in Fedora in the Kubernetes.io documentation, the >

Re: [atomic-devel] Project Atomic Logo - please comment/vote

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote: > For your information regarding the voting: The final votes should be cast in > the atomic-wg meeting. I just wanted to make this more accessible in case > other community members who are not in the WG would like to vote or

Re: [atomic-devel] system-buildah and project atomic

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Micah Abbott <miabb...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/05/2018 01:20 PM, Stephen Milner wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to move system-buildah >> (https://github.com/ashcrow/system-buildah) under the projectatomic &g

[atomic-devel] system-buildah and project atomic

Hi everyone, I'd like to move system-buildah (https://github.com/ashcrow/system-buildah) under the projectatomic GitHub namespace. system-buildah is a "simple toolbox for building system images.". It uses ocitools, jinja2 templates, and docker/buildah to generate system container ready images.

Re: [atomic-devel] Container runs under `runc` but not when wrapped by systemd

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Derek Carter wrote: >> No problem! A quick side note: If postgresql-server isn't installed on >> the host system /var/run/postgresql won't exist. You may want to use a >> tmpfiles.template (and add it to the Dockerfile COPY) to make sure >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Container runs under `runc` but not when wrapped by systemd

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Derek Carter <de...@goozbach.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> From >> https://github.com/goozbach-atomic/postgres-9.4/blob/master/config.json.template#L4 >> >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Container runs under `runc` but not when wrapped by systemd

>From >https://github.com/goozbach-atomic/postgres-9.4/blob/master/config.json.template#L4 "terminal": true, On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Hi Derek, > > it looks like the container is trying to use a terminal. > > Do you have "terminal":

Re: [atomic-devel] skopeo copy image and all tags?

developers could give a better response in terms of if it would make sense to live inside or outside skopeo proper. > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Tom McKay <thomasmc...@redhat.com> wr

[atomic-devel] Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

The Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting meeting for next week (Jan 24, 2018) is cancelled due to many of the attendees travelling to attend devconf. The meeting will resume on Jan 31st as scheduled. Note: This is the same as the original Fedora Cloud Workgroup Meeting -- Thanks, Steve Milner

[atomic-devel] Fedora Cloud Workgroup

The Fedora Cloud Workgroup meeting for next week (Jan 24, 2018) is cancelled due to many of the attendees travelling to attend devconf. The meeting will resume on Jan 31st as scheduled. -- Thanks, Steve Milner Atomic | Red Hat | http://projectatomic.io/

Re: [atomic-devel] skopeo copy image and all tags?

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Tom McKay wrote: > If I wanted to sneaker-net an image and all its tags and manifest lists, > could I use skopeo? The goal would be to mirror a registry completely. > > As an example, consider docker.io/busybox which has schema1, schema2,

Re: [atomic-devel] [WIP] Enable Atomic ISO and CloudImages on s390x in fedora rawhide

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 01/15/2018 11:36 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am working on enabling Atomic ISO and CloudImages on s390x in Fedora, >> rawhide. >> This work will require changes at multiple places like fedora-atomic

Re: [atomic-devel] Delay on blog post publication

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Sinny, Dusty, Stephen: > > There's going to be a delay on posting to the projectatomic.io blog. > We've moved to OpenShift Online Pro, but DNS propogation has been > delayed, and we're waiting for the switchover before we

Re: [atomic-devel] Docker version updates planned?

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 12/13/2017 01:51 PM, Richard Alloway wrote: > > Hi! > > I've been taking a look at Atomic OS in my "free" time and have noticed that > it is shipped with Docker 1.12.x and/or 1.13.x. > > Those branches appear to be

Re: [atomic-devel] Container Review Request: GlusterFS

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Jose A. Rivera wrote: > Hello! > > I was pointed to this list as a place I might be able to find a > reviewer for the Fedora Container Review Process. If this is not an > ideal place, please direct me elsewhere. :) > > > Following the

Re: [atomic-devel] Add Nvidia GPU to Centos Atomic Node

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Really you have two options. > > 1. unlock your ostree and install the rpms > 2. build the kernel module for the kernel you are targeting and deliver via a > system >container like in

Re: [atomic-devel] a better place for system container images?

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 11/06/2017 08:29 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >> Hi Dusty, >> >> Dusty Mabe writes: >> >>> On 11/06/2017 03:57 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: Hi, I'd like to find a better place

Re: [atomic-devel] a better place for system container images?

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Hi Dusty, > > Dusty Mabe writes: > >> On 11/06/2017 03:57 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to find a better place where to move the system container[1] >>> images that I am

Re: [atomic-devel] please help us test docker images from f27 RC 1.2

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 11/02/2017 01:47 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Tested container base image and minimal image for aarch64 and ppc64le >> on respective Fedora Atomic Host RC 1.2 . >> - Container image gets loaded successfully >>

Re: [atomic-devel] Discussion: How to keep image files in sync across repos

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > for the system containers in principle there might be more differences, > like in the config.json.template file. Agreed. If we can split these differences up into components it should become easier to generate the

Re: [atomic-devel] Discussion: How to keep image files in sync across repos

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Eliska Slobodova <eli...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> We have been trying to solve a similar problem recently for our images [1]. >&g

Re: [atomic-devel] Discussion: How to keep image files in sync across repos

ka > > [1] https://github.com/container-images > [2] https://github.com/devexp-db/distgen/ Fantastic! I'll take a look this afternoon. > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Stephen Milner <

Re: [atomic-devel] Discussion: How to keep image files in sync across repos

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > > > On 10/03/2017 09:58 AM, Stephen Milner wrote: >> In the last Atomic Community meeting I noted that keeping image files >> in sync across multiple repositories is going to become a support

[atomic-devel] Discussion: How to keep image files in sync across repos

In the last Atomic Community meeting I noted that keeping image files in sync across multiple repositories is going to become a support burden. * ACTION: ashcrow jbrooks to start discussion on how to manage multiple container repos (jberkus, 16:19:09) As an example, the

Re: [atomic-devel] Moving https://github.com/cgwalters/projectatomic-ci-infra into the org

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > Hey, > > I propose moving: > https://github.com/cgwalters/projectatomic-ci-infra > into our org, and renaming it to paci. This follows on from the > move of PAPR (formerly redhat-ci) into the org. > > See:

Re: [atomic-devel] Request for a new GitHub repo under the projectatomic/ org

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Lebon wrote: > Hi all, > > A lot of the projectatomic/ GitHub repos now use the PAPR > service (previously called redhat-ci): > > https://github.com/jlebon/papr > > It powers the PR and branch testing of those repos and > tightly

Re: [atomic-devel] firewalld in atomic host

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Ben Breard wrote: >> I'm starting to warm up to the idea of adding firewalld in Atomic Host. If >> we do this, it would be a requirement to clean up the absurd

Re: [atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting - New Day?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Pete Birley wrote: > > Hi Matthew, (and all of team Commissaire!) > > I'm sorry I too have ben so thin on the ground recently, I've been totally > swamped with getting various OpenStack on Kubernetes projects bootstrapped. > Either Monday or

[atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting: 2017-01-09

Agenda: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/b39cb0bfa0928e8f1bad0d422054f5cc The next meeting will be at 2017-01-23. For more information please see http://commissaire.readthedocs.io/en/latest/community_meetings.html. -- Thanks, Steve Milner Atomic | Red Hat | http://projectatomic.io/

[atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting: 2016-12-12

Agenda: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/2399a46717d8e6ec899b75b0ec51401c IRC Logs: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/1ef322ede59278c2885ea8b60a28a1eb The next meeting will be at 2017-01-09. For more information please see http://commissaire.readthedocs.io/en/latest/community_meetings.html. --

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:22:26PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and >> re-organize the Atomic Host documentation. Here's what I'm thinking for >>

[atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting: 2016-11-28

Agenda: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/ca15174334044c0be77591fb1f330617 IRC Logs: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/e7b033070d74b8d2eb973fb14ee0ac9d The next meeting will be at 2016-12-12. For more information please see http://commissaire.readthedocs.io/en/latest/community_meetings.html. --

Re: [atomic-devel] I would like to discuss a new IMAGE label to indicate whether an image is a --system image.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > system container. I guess we could add a label like > > LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system > > Then this would cause atomic to use the --system flag? > > Thoughts on this label? Makes sense. My only question

Re: [atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting

Correction ... Starting Nov 14th it will be every 2nd and 4th Monday at 12:30PM UTC. On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stephen Milner <smil...@redhat.com> wrote: > Good day, > > On Oct 24 we had our first Commissaire community meeting! For those > interested the agenda and

[atomic-devel] Commissaire Community Meeting

Good day, On Oct 24 we had our first Commissaire community meeting! For those interested the agenda and log from the first meeting can be found at: - Agenda: https://gist.github.com/ashcrow/351f5e80b3636a607462aaf950b28e24 - Log: https://gist.github.com/mbarnes/6966ba05315135ccb18cba265e4d29db

[atomic-devel] New and Updated Commissaire Repos

Good Day, Later this week we will be adding and updating the Project Atomic Github repositories for Commissaire. Renaming the original repo -- The original repository https://github.com/projectatomic/commissaire will become

Re: [atomic-devel] should /etc/os-release mention atomic?

On Jul 28, 2016 10:48 AM, "Waldemar Augustyn" wrote: > > It's a minor point but I wonder if /etc/os-release should mention atomic > somewhere. It's a different OS from centos/fedora listed now. Right > now I am checking rpm-ostree to tell atomic from standard centos/fedora.

Re: [atomic-devel] One-line project descriptions for Docs and the new website

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > It feels a bit odd to see the distribution names first in the Atomic Host > description. Perhaps something like: > Commissaire: > > I'm not familiar with the project and didn't feel anymore familiar with it >