Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-20 Thread Colin Walters



On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, at 12:02 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:

> rpm-ostree uninstall  for all of my packages, but there must be a 
> 'blow them all away' command, yes?

rpm-ostree uninstall --all

It's in --help but not the man page because...those get out of sync =/

See also https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1419



Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Bob Gustafson
I did some installs, but now I want to do them over again (fabric is 
using python2..)


How can I blow away all of my installs and just have the base atomic 
host (my latest version)


I could go back and do

rpm-ostree uninstall  for all of my packages, but there must be a 
'blow them all away' command, yes?


Bob G

On 11/19/18 8:00 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:

'Everything' is a big word.

So far, everything I have tried, I eventually have got to work.

All my installs have worked (not configured yet).

I suppose I could venture out into containers, but I have other things 
to do first.


I will probably try 'fabric' instead of ansible over the next few days.

Thanks much for a new platform - Bob G

On 11/19/18 3:43 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:


On 11/19/2018 04:40 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:

OK, moving right along - seems to work fine.

so you've got everything working?


I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot.

Thanks much - Bob G






Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Bob Gustafson

'Everything' is a big word.

So far, everything I have tried, I eventually have got to work.

All my installs have worked (not configured yet).

I suppose I could venture out into containers, but I have other things 
to do first.


I will probably try 'fabric' instead of ansible over the next few days.

Thanks much for a new platform - Bob G

On 11/19/18 3:43 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:


On 11/19/2018 04:40 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:

OK, moving right along - seems to work fine.

so you've got everything working?


I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot.

Thanks much - Bob G




Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Dusty Mabe



On 11/19/2018 04:40 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> OK, moving right along - seems to work fine.

so you've got everything working?

> 
> I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot.
> 
> Thanks much - Bob G



Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Bob Gustafson

OK, moving right along - seems to work fine.

[user1@pce02 ~]$ which -a postfix
/usr/bin/which: no postfix in 
(/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbi)


[user1@pce02 ~]$ rpm-ostree install postfix
 AUTHENTICATING FOR 
org.projectatomic.rpmostree1.install-uninstall-packages=

Authentication is required to install and remove software
Authenticating as: Bob Gustafson (user1)
Password:
 AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE 
Checking out tree 89bfa70... done
Enabled rpm-md repositories: fedora updates
Updating metadata for 'fedora': [=] 100%
rpm-md repo 'fedora'; generated: 2018-10-24T22:20:15Z
Updating metadata for 'updates': [=] 100%
rpm-md repo 'updates'; generated: 2018-11-19T02:11:42Z
Importing metadata [=] 100%
Resolving dependencies... done
Will download: 1 package (1.4 MB)
  Downloading from fedora: [=] 100%
Importing (1/1) [=] 100%
Checking out packages (1/1) [=] 100%
Running pre scripts... [ 2376.346930] fuse init (API version 7.27)
1 done
Running post scripts... 8 done
Writing rpmdb... done
Writing OSTree commit... done
Staging deployment... done
Freed: 422.4 MB (pkgcache branches: 0)
Added:
postfix-2:3.3.1-5.fc29.x86_64
Run "systemctl reboot" to start a reboot
[user1@pce02 ~]$

I will try to install a few more packages before doing a reboot.

Thanks much - Bob G

On 11/19/18 3:19 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:

OK, I was able to rebase to AH 29 using the following instructions:

# ostree remote gpg-import fedora-atomic -k 
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PM-GPG-KEY-fedora-29-x86_64

Imported 1 GPG key to remote "fedora-atomic"

# rpm-ostree rebase -b fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host

# systemctl reboot

I was logged in from a different machine when I did the steps above 
and the reboot disconnected me.


I tried to ssh back in, but system seemed dead.

Needed to power cycle and boot using serial port..

Result is:

Fedora 29.20181113.0 (Atomic Host)
Kernel 4.18.17-300.fc29.x86_64 on an x86_64 (ttyS0)

pce02 login: user1
Password:
Last login: Mon Nov 19 13:21:58 from 192.168.50.60
[user1@pce02 ~]$
[user1@pce02 ~]$
[user1@pce02 ~]$ uname -a
Linux pce02.chidig.com 4.18.17-300.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 5 
17:56:16 UTC 20x

[user1@pce02 ~]$

Now will try to add some 'packages'

Have fun - Bob G

On 11/19/18 11:13 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
I am using "atomic host upgrade" as my 'Hello World' test. It seems 
to be successful


The starting point was: 
Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-28-20180902.0.iso installed using a 
USB flash drive. (uncertainty - it might have been an earlier image 
on the flash drive).


The target system is a pcengines.ch APU4b4 with 4G ram, 4xGigEth, 4 
core AMD Embedded G series GX-412TC, 60 GB SSD.


At idle it is using about 4 watts including power adapter 
inefficiencies (viewed on Kill A Watt meter). No fan needed.


It does not have video, so some screwing around necessary at initial 
boot to insert console=ttyS0,115200n8


After the original system was running:

Commands given:

atomic host upgrade

...

systemctl reboot

.

Fedora 28.20181007.0 (Atomic Host)
Kernel 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 on an x86_64 (ttyS0)

pce02 login: root
Password:
Last login: Sat May 12 11:40:40 on pts/1
[root@pce02 ~]# date
Mon Nov 19 06:27:37 CST 2018
[root@pce02 ~]# uname -a
Linux pce02.chidig.com 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 30 
15:31:40 UTC 2x

[root@pce02 ~]#


The date of the Last login may have been the build date of the board 
or coreboot bios. I was having some network config problems on my 
host Fedora 29 before the successful atomic host upgrade.


It seems that the version is 28. I'm not sure why it did not upgrade 
to 29.


Thanks for all the work getting Atomic to this point.

I wonder about its future under IBM..







Re: [atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Bob Gustafson

OK, I was able to rebase to AH 29 using the following instructions:

# ostree remote gpg-import fedora-atomic -k 
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/PM-GPG-KEY-fedora-29-x86_64

Imported 1 GPG key to remote "fedora-atomic"

# rpm-ostree rebase -b fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host

# systemctl reboot

I was logged in from a different machine when I did the steps above and 
the reboot disconnected me.


I tried to ssh back in, but system seemed dead.

Needed to power cycle and boot using serial port..

Result is:

Fedora 29.20181113.0 (Atomic Host)
Kernel 4.18.17-300.fc29.x86_64 on an x86_64 (ttyS0)

pce02 login: user1
Password:
Last login: Mon Nov 19 13:21:58 from 192.168.50.60
[user1@pce02 ~]$
[user1@pce02 ~]$
[user1@pce02 ~]$ uname -a
Linux pce02.chidig.com 4.18.17-300.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 5 17:56:16 
UTC 20x

[user1@pce02 ~]$

Now will try to add some 'packages'

Have fun - Bob G

On 11/19/18 11:13 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
I am using "atomic host upgrade" as my 'Hello World' test. It seems to 
be successful


The starting point was: 
Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-28-20180902.0.iso installed using a 
USB flash drive. (uncertainty - it might have been an earlier image on 
the flash drive).


The target system is a pcengines.ch APU4b4 with 4G ram, 4xGigEth, 4 
core AMD Embedded G series GX-412TC, 60 GB SSD.


At idle it is using about 4 watts including power adapter 
inefficiencies (viewed on Kill A Watt meter). No fan needed.


It does not have video, so some screwing around necessary at initial 
boot to insert console=ttyS0,115200n8


After the original system was running:

Commands given:

atomic host upgrade

...

systemctl reboot

.

Fedora 28.20181007.0 (Atomic Host)
Kernel 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 on an x86_64 (ttyS0)

pce02 login: root
Password:
Last login: Sat May 12 11:40:40 on pts/1
[root@pce02 ~]# date
Mon Nov 19 06:27:37 CST 2018
[root@pce02 ~]# uname -a
Linux pce02.chidig.com 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 30 
15:31:40 UTC 2x

[root@pce02 ~]#


The date of the Last login may have been the build date of the board 
or coreboot bios. I was having some network config problems on my host 
Fedora 29 before the successful atomic host upgrade.


It seems that the version is 28. I'm not sure why it did not upgrade 
to 29.


Thanks for all the work getting Atomic to this point.

I wonder about its future under IBM..





[atomic-devel] "Hello World" - seems to be successful

2018-11-19 Thread Bob Gustafson
I am using "atomic host upgrade" as my 'Hello World' test. It seems to 
be successful


The starting point was: 
Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-28-20180902.0.iso installed using a USB 
flash drive. (uncertainty - it might have been an earlier image on the 
flash drive).


The target system is a pcengines.ch APU4b4 with 4G ram, 4xGigEth, 4 core 
AMD Embedded G series GX-412TC, 60 GB SSD.


At idle it is using about 4 watts including power adapter inefficiencies 
(viewed on Kill A Watt meter). No fan needed.


It does not have video, so some screwing around necessary at initial 
boot to insert console=ttyS0,115200n8


After the original system was running:

Commands given:

atomic host upgrade

...

systemctl reboot

.

Fedora 28.20181007.0 (Atomic Host)
Kernel 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 on an x86_64 (ttyS0)

pce02 login: root
Password:
Last login: Sat May 12 11:40:40 on pts/1
[root@pce02 ~]# date
Mon Nov 19 06:27:37 CST 2018
[root@pce02 ~]# uname -a
Linux pce02.chidig.com 4.18.11-200.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 30 
15:31:40 UTC 2x

[root@pce02 ~]#


The date of the Last login may have been the build date of the board or 
coreboot bios. I was having some network config problems on my host 
Fedora 29 before the successful atomic host upgrade.


It seems that the version is 28. I'm not sure why it did not upgrade to 29.

Thanks for all the work getting Atomic to this point.

I wonder about its future under IBM..