Re: [atomic-devel] Screen in Atomic

- Original Message - From: James purplei...@gmail.com To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io Cc: go...@redhat.com Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 4:18:18 PM Subject: [atomic-devel] Screen in Atomic RE:

Re: [atomic-devel] [CentOS-devel] Rebuild images ready for testing

I believe that *is* the correct URL, but it hasn't gone out to mirrors yet. The repo is also here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/atomic-host/x86_64/repo/ That did it, thanks!

Re: [atomic-devel] resize container

? TIA, Carl -- Carl J. Mosca -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] resize container

, Carl Mosca carljmo...@gmail.com wrote: I have read that bumping the size has no effect on the 10GB images. When I tried it, I saw no change in new containers On Aug 6, 2015 11:34 AM, Jeremy Eder je...@redhat.com wrote: Unfortunately, not at this time. We have some PRs out there to make

Re: [atomic-devel] docker binary

inside a container?​ -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] Determining if a host is an atomic host via /etc/os-release

I did try 'uname -r' as well to try and determine if there was a > specifically named kernel version for atomic hosts as an alternative > to determining if it's an atomic host, but to no avail. > > Best regards, > > -- > > Charlie Drage > Red Hat - OSAS Team / Project Atomic > 4096R / 0x9B3B446C > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x622CDF119B3B446C > > -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] Running docker-storage-setup from a UI

ith /dev/sdb. > > The machine readable output could maybe look like > > # docker-storage-setup status -M > /dev/vda:root > /dev/sda: > /dev/sdb:error=missing > > Or should we go full JSON right away? > > > What do you think? Am I heading down the wrong path? If nobody stops > me, I'll hopefully make some PRs soon for this, and we can discuss the > details there. > > -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] Running docker-storage-setup from a UI

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Marius Vollmer <marius.voll...@redhat.com> wrote: > Elvir Kuric <eku...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On 04/12/2016 02:28 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > > > > I think --force-wipe and --init-storage ... or any destructive operation >

Re: [atomic-devel] Running docker-storage-setup from a UI

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > COW on loopback device, how do I fix? > Want to try out Overlayfs How? > ​ ​ ​Yes! These !​ ​

Re: [atomic-devel] Introducing Commissaire

gt;>> > Have you heard about some kind of cluster host manager project and >> >>> > want to learn more? Curious about what this Commissaire thing is >> that >> >>> > has shown up in the Project Atomic GitHub repos? >> >>> > The short answer is it is a lightweight REST interface for cluster >> >>> > host management. For more information check out the introductory >> blog >> >>> > post ... >> >>> > >> >>> > >> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2016/05/introducing_commissaire/ >> >>> > >> >>> > ... and stay tuned for more in-depth posts for development and >> >>> > operations in the near future! >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Thanks, >> >>> > Steve Milner >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jason DeTiberus >> > >> > >> > > -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] Introducing Commissaire

On May 19, 2016 17:03, "Jason DeTiberus" <jdeti...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> ​Would commissaire be intended to address the case where I want to adjust config options acros

Re: [atomic-devel] Submitted ansible module for managing Atomic Host

Awesome! On Apr 15, 2016 00:32, "SGhosh" wrote: > On 04/14/2016 05:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/1902 >> >> >> See link. I thought there might be some interested parties on this list :) >> >> > You think? :) > > Thanks! >

Re: [atomic-devel] How to handle crashes

problems. We could create an abrt container that does the same for RH-based ecosystem. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hmm, appears this was not integrated into Fedora Atomic? Is there a plan > to do so? > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM

Re: [atomic-devel] Docker project: Can you have overlay2 speed and density with devicemapper? Yep.

ers? IIUC, this discussion is > specific to device mapper storage drivers right? > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Vivek Goyal (cc) and I were discussing ways to deliver page cache >> sharing, POSIX compliance and S

Re: [atomic-devel] How to apply non-atomic tuned profiles to atomic host

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 02:45 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > > Because layered products (not just OpenShift) do not want to be coupled to > the RHEL release schedule to update their profil

[atomic-devel] Docker project: Can you have overlay2 speed and density with devicemapper? Yep.

Hi, Vivek Goyal (cc) and I were discussing ways to deliver page cache sharing, POSIX compliance and SELinux support with a single docker graph driver, using existing kernel facilities. We decided to go with a bind-mount technique, and Vivek has posted a first cut here:

Re: [atomic-devel] We have a bugzilla requesting that we change the default CMD to systemd for base images in RHEL

e.) > > Best, > > jzb > > > -- > Joe Brockmeier > Senior Evangelist, Linux Containers > j...@redhat.com > Twitter: @jzb > > -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] We have a bugzilla requesting that we change the default CMD to systemd for base images in RHEL

Sorry hit send too soon. other thing i was going to mention is if we have 2 bases, then the minimal one should take advantage of Colin's research into yum micro (I forget the exact name). On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com> wrote: > rhel7:pet > > On Fr

[atomic-devel] How to apply non-atomic tuned profiles to atomic host

Hi, Right now we've got the tuned package in the base atomic content. There are atomic-host and atomic-guest tuned profiles which are currently identical to the atomic-openshift ones. We'd like to make a change to the atomic-openshift-node/master profiles (which are distributed with the

Re: [atomic-devel] How to apply non-atomic tuned profiles to atomic host

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 01:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > > Going fwd, I think we would rather not maintain two locations (atomic-* > and atomic-openshift-* tuned profiles with identical content.

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 26 change: using overlayfs as default

:07 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/05/2017 05:15 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com > > <mailto:jber...@redhat.com>>wrote: > > > > Also, performance is MUCH better on PostgreS

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 26 change: using overlayfs as default

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Also, performance is MUCH better on PostgreSQL pgbench than devicemapper > is. Like 3X better. Details please? Were you using the loopback dm driver?

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

ocker pull candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap < >> http://candidate-registry.fedoraproject.org/f26/systemtap> >> > >> > Both images have help files, so please read them prior using the >> containers: >> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/tools/blob/master/f/ >> root/README.md >> > https://github.com/container-images/systemtap/blob/master/help/help.md >> > >> > (or `atomic help $the_container_image`) >> > >> > [1] https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/214 >> > > -- -- Jeremy Eder

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

Forgot to add Will Cohen (discussed stap errors with him briefly). Also my replies won't make it to the dev list since I am not subscribed (just fyi I guess). On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com> wrote: > First of all, that readme is awesome. > >

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

has always worked in the rhel-tools container...the label on that image includes --privileged. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/05/2017 01:18 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote: > > setenforce 0 works...security-opt label:disable does not. > >

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

front works for me. > > > > The LABEL would be the preferred way. > > Sure, just someone(tm) needs to find the Dockerfile in git. I > couldn't find it from a dozen minutes reading > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > and pals. > > > - FChE > -- -- Jeremy Eder