Re: [atomic-devel] Screen in F22 Atomic?

I was a casual user of 'screen' and made the switch to 'tmux' after learning it was the only option in Atomic. Took me about a day or two to get comfortable with 'tmux' and I find it much more useful than 'screen'. Another +1 to just 'tmux' -Micah - Original Message - From: Matthew

[atomic-devel] atomic-bugs mailing list for Fedora components

A few weeks ago, we looked at bugs reported against Project Atomic components (atomic, docker, kubernetes, ostree, etc.) under the Fedora product category and it was noticed that the QA Contact for many of these components is 'extras-qa@fedoraproject', which does not exist. This doesn't seem

Re: [atomic-devel] can fedora atomic 23 be upgraded to 24

/projectatomic/atomic-devmode/blob/master/HACKING.md On Wed, Jun 22, 2016, 6:09 PM Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org <mailto:walt...@verbum.org>> wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309075 On Wed, Jun 22, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Micah Abbott wrote: > On 06/22/2016 09

Re: [atomic-devel] Smaller fedora & centos images

On 06/20/2016 09:38 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Have we published any comparisons of an Alpine image "fully loaded" (e.g., with the actual tools) vs. Fedora, etc.? AIUI, when you actually install things like Apache httpd, or whatnot the comparison looks much closer. I hacked up some quick

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

For anyone interested in the package diffs between the last two week release (23.68) and the most recent (23.79), I've got you covered. The URL below contains the output from... # rpm-ostree db diff --format diff 51b12b199c 1a68c7b9c0 ...which are the commit IDs for 23.68 and 23.79

[atomic-devel] moving atomic-host-tests repo under projectatomic org

Hi folks- At my $DAYJOB, I do QE for RHEL Atomic Host. We have a collection of automation that we use to test releases and I was tasked on moving those tests upstream [1][2]. The tests were originally developed using UATFramework [3] which used Python + behave + Ansible to perform various

Re: [atomic-devel] moving atomic-host-tests repo under projectatomic org

On 04/12/2016 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 07/04/16 16:58, Micah Abbott wrote: Assuming there are no objections, I would like to complete the transfer tomorrow, Friday April 8. did this happen ? Josh completed the transfer today. https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-tests

Re: [atomic-devel] No Openscap for Fedora Atomic?

On 06/27/2016 06:32 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Folks, Unlike RHEL and CentOS, Fedora Atomic seems to be missing the Openscap service required to run atomic scan. What's involved in getting this added in? I don't believe OpenSCAP is included in either RHEL or CentOS AH (see below). I believe

Re: [atomic-devel] Structure of Atomic Host docs for Fedora and CentOS

I think Joe is referencing this - http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2016/03/introducing-atomic-devmode/ On 12/07/2016 07:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Right, but we also specifically have a developer mode for Atomic Host. Not just for OpenShift but generally for anybody who wants to work on

Re: [atomic-devel] Buildah in projectatomic/

On 03/14/2017 06:56 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Folks, The Buildah project (https://github.com/nalind/buildah) would like to move under projectatomic. I'm in favor of this; not entirely sure why it wasn't there in the first place. +1 Objections?

Re: [atomic-devel] Python 2 and Atomic Host

On 08/02/2017 10:20 AM, Colin Walters wrote: Hey, just a quick note here that I've been waging a fight to keep /usr/bin/python as Python 2 for Fedora Atomic Host, and in general to support Ansible. This was covered on LWN: https://lwn.net/Articles/729366/ For openshift-ansible I think we're

Re: [atomic-devel] New SELinux/Container Blog

Too bad LiveJournal doesn't rewrite the URL for mobile devices: http://m.livejournal.com/read/user/danwalsh/76358.html On 06/20/2017 03:50 PM, Jeff Ligon wrote: Looks like crap on a phone. Is that livejournal? On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Daniel Walsh

Re: [atomic-devel] please help us test atomic workstation/host images for f27

On 11/2/17 10:12 AM, Colin Walters wrote: On Wed, Nov 1, 2017, at 10:16 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Atomic workstation is included in the normal fedora release process and is part of RC 1.7:

[atomic-devel] CANCELED - [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting

Hey all- Let's cancel this weeks meeting due to the following: - Red Hat Summit - low priority issues tagged 'meeting' - previous meeting action items already completed If you have a topic or issue you would like discussed at the next meeting (16-May-2018), please open a new issue on the

[atomic-devel] Additional Discussion about the Future of Atomic Host + Container Linux

Many of you probably saw the recent press release or related news about the future of Atomic Host + Container Linux. https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-unveils-roadmap-coreos-integration-red-hat-openshift As press releases go, it had plenty of buzzwords but was also partly

Re: [atomic-devel] Documenting "rpm-ostree override"

On 05/17/2018 11:04 AM, Chris Negus wrote: Thanks. I added a write-up of "rpm-ostree override" to the Atomic Install and Config guide (currently in QA). I'd be glad for any comments:

Re: [atomic-devel] Documenting "rpm-ostree override"

On 05/17/2018 03:38 PM, Chris Negus wrote: - Original Message - On 05/17/2018 11:04 AM, Chris Negus wrote: Thanks. I added a write-up of "rpm-ostree override" to the Atomic Install and Config guide (currently in QA). I'd be glad for any comments:

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-05-23

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-05-23/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-05-23-16.29.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-05-23/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-05-23-16.29.txt Log:

Re: [atomic-devel] replicate a fedora Atomic changes and layered packages to other machines

On 06/02/2018 01:43 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: Here is my situation. I have a cluster of 6 VM with all running Fedora 28 server. These VM are dedicated to become a Kubernetes HA cluster, each VM being a node with a specific role (etcd, worker or controler). Until now, the cluster was built with

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-06-06

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-06/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-06-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-06-06/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-06-06-16.30.txt Log:

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-02-14

=== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg === Meeting started by miabbott at 16:31:01 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-02-14/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-02-14-16.31.log.html .

Re: [atomic-devel] system-buildah and project atomic

On 02/05/2018 01:20 PM, Stephen Milner wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to move system-buildah (https://github.com/ashcrow/system-buildah) under the projectatomic GitHub namespace. system-buildah is a "simple toolbox for building system images.". It uses ocitools, jinja2 templates, and

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup

In the 'atomic-host-tests' repo[0], we have a test[1] that was based on the Red Hat docs[2] for setting up a single node kuberenetes cluster. We had to adapt the test to work with system containers on Fedora 27 and I made a quick and dirty gist[3] of the steps we ended up with. Having said

Re: [atomic-devel] [CoreOS] Starting a Container SIG

On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: Greeting all, The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the Atomic WG, since this Working Group is now going to focus mostly on Fedora CoreOS, I propose to create a new container SIG to regroup people interested in the

Re: [atomic-devel] Proposing moving https://github.com/stefwalter/oci-kvm-hook into projectatomic

On 02/16/2018 02:52 PM, Stef Walter wrote: On 16.02.2018 20:34, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 02/16/2018 11:23 AM, Colin Walters wrote: Hi, In working on our CI (and just locally in containers in general), I find

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-04-11

minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-11/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-11-16.30.html minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-11/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-11-16.30.txt log:

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-04-04

Forgot to send the minutes from the April 4th meeting in a timely fashion. Apologies! minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_atomic_wg/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-04-16.30.html minutes (text):

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-04-18

minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-18/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-18-16.29.html minutes (text): https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-18/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-18-16.29.txt log:

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-04-25

minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-25/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-25-16.30.html minutes (text): https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-04-25/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-04-25-16.30.txt full log:

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-03-28

minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-28-16.30.html minutes (text): https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-03-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-03-28-16.30.txt log:

Re: [atomic-devel] atomic install/run cockpit does not work on atomic-ws

On 03/29/2018 12:34 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > rpm-ostree upgrade --check it gives me, mporting metadata [=] 100% ** ERROR:src/app/rpmostree-dbus-helpers.c:1362:rpmostree_print_cached_update: assertion failed: (g_variant_dict_lookup (, "ref-has-new-commit", "b", _new_checksum))

[atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2018-02-28

summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-02-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-02-28-16.32.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-02-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2018-02-28-16.32.log.html #fedora-meeting-1:

Re: [atomic-devel] rpm-ostree rebase and the keyring

On 10/31/2018 01:56 PM, Michael Hill wrote: Thanks, Micah. I got the key added but it fails with the same error. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:38 PM Micah Abbott wrote: That suggests that the GPG key was already imported, hmm... I thought I had success with the key the first time but got

Re: [atomic-devel] rpm-ostree rebase and the keyring

On 10/31/2018 02:57 PM, Michael Hill wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 2:08 PM Micah Abbott wrote: Try deleting the remote and the key on the host and re-adding it all again: Done, same result. Is the trusted keyring affected if I transplant the hard drive into a different laptop? I don't

Re: [atomic-devel] rpm-ostree rebase and the keyring

On 10/31/2018 12:34 PM, Michael Hill wrote: I can upgrade f28, but I'm still stuck trying to rebase to f29. $ rpm-ostree rebase fedora/29/x86_64/silverblue error: Commit fb3618dd8dd5f3e40ccca7d3c5464e05c12afdcb2636401a54a4a69552074606: GPG signatures found, but none are in trusted keyring $

Re: [atomic-devel] Fwd: upgrade 28 to 29

On 10/31/2018 12:09 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: -- Forwarded message - From: *arnaud gaboury* > Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:27 PM Subject: Fwd: upgrade 28 to 29 To: atomic-devel > I am running Atomic

Re: [atomic-devel] Rebase Fedora Atomic 27 > 29 fails to boot

A search on the `Assertion` error shows this bug as a possible match for what you are seeing - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653059 There are some workarounds to try in there, though the underlying problem (if it is indeed the same) should be fixed in F29. On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at