On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 06:40:58AM +0200, Thomas Börkel wrote:
HI!
Axel Thimm wrote:
I was able to compile the src rpms a while ago (Myth 0.18 or 0.19, I
think), but now I get:
error: line 1: Unknown tag: %lib_package myth-0.20.2 0
Either my macros are too old (where do I find
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:34:44PM -0400, Roland Roberts wrote:
When trying to a straight yum update on a newly installed FC7, I got
the above error which I eventually tracked to being caused by attempting
to update flac:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum update flac
Setting up Update
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
During the start of my relocation Victor, my 6 week-old, got sick and
has to be hospitalized for an unknown time.
Thanks all for the wishes on and off list!
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpNdLvZojL4W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 8/30/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:39:53PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
On 8/17/07, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resending to atrpms-devel. Are the build macros and build options for
packages listed somewhere? Would be great to get them so I can
On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:37:38 am Anthony Messina wrote:
should the 1.0.2 ivtv package require the ivtv-kmdl? i can see that the
ivtv-kmdl package should require ivtv. i am using the fedora 2.6.22 kernel,
so i'd prefer to use the built-in kernel module if possible.
yum
Axel Thimm wrote:
This looks like a bug in yum. Try the yum clean xxx options to make
yum refetch the metadata and redo its indices. If that doesn't help
please report aginst yum on bugzilla.redhat.com. You can put my email
on the Cc: if you like. Thanks!
I had already tried yum clean all :-(
I have a tendency to just click 'Reply' in Thunderbird when responding
to the various mailing lists I subscribe to. On all of them except
ATrpms this is usually not a problem because the headers have the
ReplyTo set to the list not the Sender.
Is there anything I can do client side to make
HI!
I now that there will be no new atrpms packages for FC5.
But could the last version of them be made available somewhere?
I still can install packages from Fedora Core and Fedora Extra, although
they will not be updated. Would be nice, if the same would be possible
for atrpms.
Thomas
On 8/31/07, Thomas Börkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI!
I now that there will be no new atrpms packages for FC5.
But could the last version of them be made available somewhere?
I still can install packages from Fedora Core and Fedora Extra, although
they will not be updated. Would be nice,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Thomas Börkel wrote:
I now that there will be no new atrpms packages for FC5.
But could the last version of them be made available somewhere?
I still can install packages from Fedora Core and Fedora Extra, although
they will not be updated. Would
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 06:42:32AM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:37:38 am Anthony Messina wrote:
should the 1.0.2 ivtv package require the ivtv-kmdl? i can see that the
ivtv-kmdl package should require ivtv. i am using the fedora 2.6.22 kernel,
so i'd prefer to
i was wondering 2 things (well more than that, but for this issue...)
1. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is not in the ivtv-firmware
package
2. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is placed in /lib/modules
instead of /lib/firmware
the reason i ask is because, with selinux
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:22:04AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
On 8/30/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:39:53PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
On 8/17/07, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resending to atrpms-devel. Are the build macros and build options for
Axel Thimm wrote:
Maybe I should make that the default. There are two camps that say
have the list do that, or let the user have the choice. Until now
I went with the max-freedom variant, which also means more config by
user side.
Anyway there are pros and cons and I have also grown weary of
On 8/31/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! Just read the other thread about it, too. Are all rpms built
with no options, or do you sometimes supply build options for rpms? If
so, where can I find out what options were used to build any
particular ATrpms binary (but MythTV
On 8/31/07, Mike LaPlante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a tendency to just click 'Reply' in Thunderbird when responding
to the various mailing lists I subscribe to. On all of them except
ATrpms this is usually not a problem because the headers have the
ReplyTo set to the list not the Sender.
16 matches
Mail list logo
