Thanks for the help with this!
Your repo and your support are awesome.
Larry
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:25:19PM -0500, Larry wrote:
Interesting to note that I just did yum update again and now only the
mplayer missing dependency is complaining. I tried several times Friday
.at
As always thanks..
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
to initialize video and
I believe this is the fix.
Its not a rush as I have the system working on an older kernel so I just
wanted to see how I will be able to tell when this hits.
Thanks,
Larry
BTW Great news about your child Axel. Go spend some quality time with him
?
Can an upgrade to/reinstall of FC5+ be done in-place, without wiping out my
existing Myth configuration (i.e., among other things, myth uses a logical
volume that spans a 200GB partition on the boot disk, plus a second 300GB
disk).
Appreciate any guidance you can offer...
Larry
to install FC3 and bring in all the
packages per Jarod's guide. I seem to recall it was an apt-get dist-upgrade
to do this.
Thanks,
Larry
On 1/19/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:48:35PM -0500, Larry K wrote:
I have a FC3 box running Myth 0.18, and I would like
Greetings to all and thanks to Axel et. al. for providing these prepackaged
binaries...
My latest journey.
I just upgraded my FC3 0.18 box by reinstalling FC7 and mythtv from atrpms
to get past this zap2it problem. Initially, the install DVD gave me kernel
2.6.21-1.3194, and after the yum
We apparently live in parallel universes:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/atrpms/users/9582
On 9/20/07, Josh Mastronarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a variation on the where are the kmdls for 2.6.22.5-76
question; I have read the archives and understand that Axel is in the
process
of the database in order to roll back).
Does the myth package care about my kernel version? I don't think it does.
So, I should be able to upgrade both machines with
yum install mythtv.
Right?
Once I upgrade to 0.21, if I have issues, how do I get back to 0.20?
Thanks!
Larry
I looked for a mirror site I could point yum to, but did not find one. Does
one exist that is not dependent upon this site being up?
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
Looks like it is down. Is there a mirror website that I can point yum to?
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
and turned up to 100%.
Any idea why I am having so much trouble configuring sound on this new box?
Is this hardware just a little bit ahead of the drivers?
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo
it a shot...
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Larry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently upgraded my Myth BE/FE combo machine using this new Asus board
and ATRPMs, and now I am having problems getting audio to work
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Larry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The myth wiki (
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Configuring_Digital_Sound) suggests
that pulse (or any other sound server) should not be used
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Larry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The myth wiki (
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Configuring_Digital_Sound) suggests
that pulse (or any other sound server) should not be used
.fc9.i386
I'm trying to build a new FE using kernel 2.6.27.5-41 and an old but
serviceable FX5200 card. I settled on this kernel mostly because it is
currently supported on ATRPMS with respect to alsa, lirc, etc.
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms
at the end of the tunnel? I'm wondering if I need to
abandon this video card and move on. Or, if I should wait for this to be
resolved one way or the other...
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman
card.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Jeff Bevis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry K wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, John Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Axel,
Any chance of getting nVidia 173.14.12 (legacy) kmdls for the new F9
kernel (2.6.27.5-37)? Am I just being impatient
options for an in-place upgrade?
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
Similar reason, although I wonder why yum doesn't suggest to download
the missing packages. Maybe you disabled some of Fedora's repos?
Axel,
I wondered if all the repos were working. I have not intentionally disabled
anything.
Here are the initial yum messages. Looks like freshrpms had
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:51:22AM -0400, Larry K wrote:
Similar reason, although I wonder why yum doesn't suggest to download
the missing packages. Maybe you disabled some of Fedora's repos?
4325 packages
Not sure how that got in there, but now that I have priorities turned off,
I am able to get a clean update. Well, almost. For some reason, freshrpms
reports a checksum error. This has been going on for some time, if I
recall.
[Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum
If I
How should this be the case? If the packages are not available then
the update can't magically access them.
I guess that question sounded silly, but the update seemed to just know
that the last supported FC9 kernel on atrpms was 2.6.27.24-78.2.53. At
least, that's the kernel and kmdl pkgs
Is any notification sent to this list or posted to atrpms site when support
for say the oldest fedora core is dropped?I am still runnning fc10 now,
and I am anticipating the upgrade from myth 0.21 to 0.22.
I have gotten burned a few times in the past when the yum upgrade failed
because I was
I just upgraded to the latest and greatest mythtv (and all the other
bits) and all is well except I can no longer record programs. A little
digging reveals that it is most likely due to not having the video4linux
kmdl's for the latest kernel.
[root@mythbe1 bin]# uname -a
Linux
On 6/10/2011 4:28 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
On 10/06/11 00:55, Larry Roberts wrote:
I just upgraded to the latest and greatest mythtv (and all the other
bits) and all is well except I can no longer record programs. A little
digging reveals that it is most likely due to not having
for the work you do. Its greatly appreciated!
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
On 6/11/2011 3:09 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 09:17 -0400, Larry Roberts wrote:
So can I ask how you went about building your own? I'm fine with
doing that but I really dont have a clue on how to build an rpm. My
experience with building is limited to the old
fashion
I just used yum upgrade to go from fc12 to fc14, and mostly, it went well.
I have the system up, and was able to install the latest nvidia-graphics
package using yum. now, when I try to install mythtv, I get these errors:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package:
BIOS. The install finally went through, but the subsequent reboot
never finished, and I got a stack trace...Oh well.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:53 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 22/02/12 14:25, George Galt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Larry Klunchtimela...@gmail.com
I am trying to install the nvidia driver on an fc16 box running
kernel 3.2.9-1.
uname -a
Linux mythtv 3.2.9-1.fc16.i686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 1 01:58:05 UTC 2012 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
For a brief time, I had booted kernel 3.2.10-3, but I backed off that when
I noticed that atrpms didn't yet have the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:05 AM, John Pilkington j.p...@tesco.net wrote:
On 23/03/12 01:53, Larry K wrote:
I am trying to install the nvidia driver on an fc16 box running
kernel 3.2.9-1.
uname -a
Linux mythtv 3.2.9-1.fc16.i686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 1 01:58:05 UTC 2012 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Is nvidia-graphics for ELS6 correct in the repo? All I see via the website
is two packages, one of which is a source rpm. It looks conspicuously
different from say nvidia-graphics-beta as well as the legacy packages.
Thanks!
___
atrpms-users mailing
Anyone? Is this working as intended?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Larry K lunchtimela...@gmail.com wrote:
Is nvidia-graphics for ELS6 correct in the repo? All I see via the
website is two packages, one of which is a source rpm. It looks
conspicuously different from say nvidia-graphics
Since I upgraded from myth 0.25.2 to 0.25.3 using atrpms, It looks like
mythmetadatalookup no longer works. Attached below is the output from the
command. Any thoughts?
mythmetadatalookup --version
Please attach all output as a file in bug reports.
MythTV Version : v0.25.3
MythTV Branch :
of the pythons
scripts located at
/usr/share/mythtv/metadata/Television/ttvdb.py and
/usr/share/mythtv/metadata/Movie/tmdb.py
In both cases, the first line of each script was missing the python
directive: #!/usr/bin/python
Once I fixed this, mythmetadatalookup started working. Word to the wise.
Larry
of the pythons
scripts located at
/usr/share/mythtv/metadata/Television/ttvdb.py and
/usr/share/mythtv/metadata/Movie/tmdb.py
In both cases, the first line of each script was missing the python
directive: #!/usr/bin/python
Once I fixed this, mythmetadatalookup started working. Word to the wise.
Larry
On 12/16/2012 4:13 AM, Collier Family wrote:
On 13/12/2012 3:14 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
On 11/12/12 10:55, John Pilkington wrote:
On 11/12/12 09:03, Collier Family wrote:
I now have this on my frontend as well.
I now have rpms for 6.3 x86_64, x386 and F17 x386
If anyone wants a copy I
I am trying to install the mythtv-0.25 package but yum says it is not
found. Do I have to configure anything special in my atrpms.repo to get
this to work?
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Larry K lunchtimela...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to install the mythtv-0.25 package but yum says it is not
found. Do I have to configure anything special in my atrpms.repo to get
this to work?
Solved, kind of.
I found that if I run
yum install mythtv
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Larry K lunchtimela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Paul myli...@wilsononline.id.au wrote:
You seem to be running from Root is that correct?
Yes. Running as root.
I was able to resolve this problem. It seems that the MythTV 0.25.3
On 10/2/2013 12:56 PM, Ib Uhrskov wrote:
Hi
Please notice that mythweb-0.26 is being updated to mythweb-0.27 if
you just do a yum update like me. It can't work with 0.26 and breaks
the mythweb dbversion by bumping it from 3 to 4.
- and there is no old 0.26 package in the repository
Best
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Larry Roberts myt...@american-hero.comwrote:
On 9/28/2013 5:24 PM, Bill Meek wrote:
On 09/28/2013 03:32 PM, Larry Roberts wrote:
On 9/28/2013 10:18 AM, Bill Meek wrote:
...
2013-09-28 16:27:20.884924 I [1944/4037] HttpServer104
servicehost.cpp:281
Stephen,
Thanks for posting your repo. I've installed your long-lived driver and I
get an error loading the nvidia module. Any ideas?
X.Org X Server 1.15.0
Release Date: 2013-12-27
[21.327] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[21.327] Build Operating System: c6b8 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64
[
is somewhat schizophrenic. I can
provide more details if anyone can lend a hand.
Larry
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
44 matches
Mail list logo
