The previous time migration was mostly painless. There were some changes
for sure but most code could be translated either outright trivially, or
mostly straightforwardly.
Off the top of my head, most changes were:
1. different syntax for dataviewtypes and a different default when
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:37 PM aditya siram wrote:
> I know it's early to ask this but do you anticipate a large migration effort
> between ATS2 and ATS3?
Do you mean "we need a translator to ATS3 code from ATS2 code"?
I believe someone, include me, can create such translator using
following
Please don't wait!
As far as I can tell, all the features in ATS2 should be
supported in ATS3. And the syntax of ATS3 is nearly all
based on that of ATS2. There are only minor changes and
some additions.
Translating ATS2 code into ATS3 should be straightforward.
As matter of fact, I myself plan
I know it's early to ask this but do you anticipate a large migration
effort between ATS2 and ATS3? Are you planning to change significant
portions of the syntax, cut any large features etc? I'm working on
something that's liable to grow to 7-10,000 LOC and trying to figure out if
I should
