>>Does that mean if you know C you'll be able to learn ATS3 (relatively)
>>comfortably without knowing sml or some other ml variant?
Knowing C is very useful when learning ATS.
However, ATS tries to promote a programming style that is very different
from the standard style of writing code in C.
I have experience coming the other way (Haskell to ATS2), and I think it
works well enough - I did pick up some C/low-level programming along the
way, and the mailing list has expertise in both areas and can help you.
I suspect it will work the same going to other way, though I have a
hunch ATS
noob question:
Does that mean if you know C you'll be able to learn ATS3 (relatively)
comfortably without knowing sml or some other ml variant?
On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 7:04:24 PM UTC, gmhwxi wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your long and continual interest in ATS :)
>
> I would like to wait
