Yes indeed! This seems to be as fast as the C code. I can't find any
substantial difference, at least. I'll push these changes and take a
look at Hongwei's comments next :)
Thanks!
On 07/20/2018 03:33 AM, Artyom Shalkhakov wrote:
> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 1:22:47 PM UTC+6, Vanessa McHale
It doesn't seem to affect things in a way that I can measure, though
thankfully with Artyom's suggestions the code is now as fast as C (or at
least, I can't reliably measure any difference in the two) :)
On 07/20/2018 08:39 AM, gmhwxi wrote:
> fun loop2 { i : nat | i > 0 && i <= n+1 } .. (x :
