Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
Not sure whether the attached bash script may be useful to other
people, I have written it to detect suspicious blanks on all files
that come into a patch, so that if some day I submit some other patch,
the same problem will not
Hello Tassilo,
[...]
Bye,
Tassilo
BTW: Your patches contained some minor problems in that they introduced
trailing whitespaces and spaces before tabs in indented code. New
versions of Git emit warnings for that that and it was easy to fix them
after applying your patches. But still,
Hello Tassilo,
From: t...@gnu.org
To: vincent@hotmail.fr
CC: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:26:40 +0200
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes
Here you are.
Vincent.
From: t...@gnu.org
To: vincent@hotmail.fr
CC: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:18:00 +0200
Vincent Belaïche writes:
Hi Vincent,
Attached is the other patch
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Here you are.
Thanks, applied. Could you please also document `TeX-add-style-hook's
new third argument in the info docs.
Bye,
Tassilo
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
Trying to catch-up the discussion...
To: auctex@gnu.org
From: t...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:34:49 +0200
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
[...]
I renamed it `nor' because I think that a user may want to pass
explicitly `(nor
Ok, now I look into Tassilo's feedback on the patch itself...
To: auctex@gnu.org
From: t...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:49:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent
@hotmail.fr; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:37:03 +0200
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes:
I have only a concern about this patch: we should release a new
version of AUCTeX these days, if the plan
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
BTW, in my previous email I proposed a defun for (not...), but please
note that with this defun `not' must have one single *dialect*
argument (`dialect' as opposed to `dialect expression').
So (nor x y) is equivalent to (not (or x
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate
info doc update NEWS entry (Vincent, could you please add that?)
Yes, of course, I will do that in the next patch version.
Do that once we have settled on a specific patch
with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:56:02 +0200
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate
info doc update NEWS entry (Vincent, could you please add that?)
Yes
Just to say: do not pay too much attention to the ChangeLog is the patch
attached to my previous mail, as it needs update --- I will do that with
the rests of pending changes (ie NEWS manual).
Vincent.
Hello,
Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook
dialect sets.
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
BTW I could not find the issue tracker at
https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/auctex, are you at all using an
issue tracker (or AUCTeX does not have any issues :-P :-DDD ).
We're currently using a plain mailinglist (bug-auc...@gnu.org). That's
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
Please ignore the previous patch attachment: I had not made all the
corresponding updates in the ChangeLog.
Ok. Some last nitpicks below.
diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
index f3316d5..9bbcb29 100644
--- a/tex.el
+++ b/tex.el
@@
Hi Vincent and Tassilo,
2014-09-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr:
Concerning this one I did it with taking into account the comments:
- handling bibtex case (from Mosè) but I have not tested whether this
solves it. Also I used bib-cite.el file which might be not
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes:
I have only a concern about this patch: we should release a new
version of AUCTeX these days, if the plan still holds, I'm not sure we
should apply a not so tested, though valuable, patch before the
release.
FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
First of all, I must apologize to you Tassilo, I had overlooked your
comment about defalias not supporting docstring for XEmacs, so in my
last contrib (small optimization) that was not corrected.
Question: shouldn't I provide a
Please ignore the previous patch attachment: I had not made all the
corresponding updates in the ChangeLog.
Hello Tassilo et alii,
[...]
Bye,
Vincent.
Re-Bye,
Vincent.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 9b70f3a..2318fb7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,329 @@
Hello Tassilo et alii,
My updated patch attached. Comment inserted below.
From: t...@gnu.org
To: vincent@hotmail.fr
CC: m...@gnu.org; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:44:16 +0200
Vincent
Hello,
I am back at it.
First of all, I must apologize to you Tassilo, I had overlooked your
comment about defalias not supporting docstring for XEmacs, so in my
last contrib (small optimization) that was not corrected.
Question: shouldn't I provide a small patch only for that defalias
20 matches
Mail list logo