[AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. dbc87df41c22a68d98629c65653afa07cfb5e398

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "GNU AUCTeX". The branch, master has been updated via dbc87df41c22a68d98629c65653afa07cfb5e398 (commit) via

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Implementing TeX-update

Ok, no one objected, then I've applied the patches. Happy TeXing with new C-c C-u command! Bye, Mosè 2015-08-24 18:27 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano : > 2015-08-17 12:26 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano : >> Hi list, >> >> I've implemented TeX-update, as suggested in the wishlist.

[AUCTeX-devel] How to check whether makeindex should be rerun?

Hi all, differently from what it's said in section 1.3.2.1 of the manual, AUCTeX never suggests to run makeindex when needed. Does someone know how can we check whether we need to run makeindex? The .idx file is rewritten after every latex run, so it's useless to look to its modification time,

[AUCTeX-devel] [RFC] parsing \jobname in LaTeX files?

Hi all, I'd like to do a little survey: does someone find useful to correctly parse \jobname in LaTeX files? To be clear, as it is now, \include{\jobname-foo} \addbibresource{\jobname.bib} are ignored by the parser.[1] Do you think it's valuable to make \jobname be replaced by

[AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

Hi I have the above setting (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode) however when I open a LaTeX file the symbols are not prettified I have to manually turn off and on the prettify-symbols-mode, can sombody verify this? (Using GNU emacs 25.0.5 and auctex git) Uwe Brauer

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > So basically, with AUCTeX from git or 11.88.8 from ELPA, > `prettify-symbols-mode' should just work without anything for users to > do except for enabling the mode manually or in LaTeX-mode-hook. > but you need GNU emacs >25

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

On Mon150831 12:59, Uwe Brauer wrote: I have the above setting (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode) however when I open a LaTeX file the symbols are not prettified I have to manually turn off and on the prettify-symbols-mode, can sombody verify this? May I add a comment

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

Uwe Brauer writes: >> Just for the record: I've just added `prettify-symbols-mode' support for >> (La)TeX to Emacs' built-in tex-mode.el. If you run a very, very recent >> emacs, you could activate that in AUCTeX using >> >> (setq-local prettify-symbols-alist

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)

Uwe Brauer writes: > I have the above setting > (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode) > > however when I open a LaTeX file the symbols are not prettified I have > to manually turn off and on the prettify-symbols-mode, can sombody > verify this? Indeed, I

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] latex-pretty-symbols.el and subscripts (x-symbol): don't display _ or ^

Uwe Brauer writes: >> So basically, with AUCTeX from git or 11.88.8 from ELPA, >> `prettify-symbols-mode' should just work without anything for users >> to do except for enabling the mode manually or in LaTeX-mode-hook. > > but you need GNU emacs >25 (I say this because 25.0.5 I