Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Fix about usage of kpsewhich

2017-12-01 23:34 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : >> Braces + comma should be fine. > > Unless there are directories containing comma itself in the PATH. Is > that an allowed character in Windows file systems? It's allowed in NTFS, according to Wikipedia[1]: In Win32 namespace: any

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Fix about usage of kpsewhich

Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Keita, > > sorry for the late reply, these days I'm getting all @gnu.org emails > with huge delay. > > 2017-12-01 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita : >> Hi all, >> >> First I apologize my repeated mistakes in recent commits with regard to >>

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Fix about usage of kpsewhich

Hi Keita, sorry for the late reply, these days I'm getting all @gnu.org emails with huge delay. 2017-12-01 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita : > Hi all, > > First I apologize my repeated mistakes in recent commits with regard to > the usage of kpsewhich. The function

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 9fdfe2c3d466d0a37b2d46b94052516e16d2c0c5

Hi Mosè, thanks for confirmation. > Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-11-29 18:38 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita : >> My current idea is to fix the relavant code with the attached patch. >> Could you please take a look and see whether it is reasonable? > Are the braces

[AUCTeX-devel] Fix about usage of kpsewhich

Hi all, First of all, I apologize my repeated mistakes in recent commits with regard to the usage of kpsewhich. The function `TeX-tree-expand' in the latest git repository is broken badly. Since the new release is planned to be soon, it's better to clean up the things without much delay, I

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Failing tests

> Mosè Giordano writes: > This does the trick, I should have recalled it having wrote that > snippet ;-) I also took the occasion to reduce a bit code duplication > in tests. Thank you, this makes writing tests easy. >>> For the second one (this is the issue related to

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Failing tests

> Mosè Giordano writes: > This does the trick, I should have recalled it having wrote that > snippet ;-) I also took the occasion to reduce a bit code duplication > in tests. Thank you, this makes writing tests easy. >>> For the second one (this is the issue related to

[AUCTeX-devel] Fix about usage of kpsewhich

Hi all, First I apologize my repeated mistakes in recent commits with regard to the usage of kpsewhich. The function `TeX-tree-expand' in the latest git repository is broken badly. Since the new release is planned to be soon, it's better to clean up the things without much delay, I think.

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 9fdfe2c3d466d0a37b2d46b94052516e16d2c0c5

Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Keita, > > 2017-11-29 18:38 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita : >> My current idea is to fix the relavant code with the attached patch. >> Could you please take a look and see whether it is reasonable? > > Are the braces necessary? Otherwise

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [AUCTeX-diffs] GNU AUCTeX branch, master, updated. 9fdfe2c3d466d0a37b2d46b94052516e16d2c0c5

Hi Keita, 2017-11-29 18:38 GMT+01:00 Ikumi Keita : > My current idea is to fix the relavant code with the attached patch. > Could you please take a look and see whether it is reasonable? Are the braces necessary? The comma seems to work for me on Debian GNU/Linux. David,